List,
as you can see from the below, a grandfather of Smalltalk (Peter Naur: Algol, Backus-Naur-Form BNF) receives the 2005 Turing award. Q: anybody else besides Jecel and me who have used Algol ? :) /Klaus ------- Forwarded message ------- From: ACMBulletin <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Cc: Subject: ACM Announces 2005 A.M. Turing Award Winner Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:26:48 +0100 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACM Bulletin - March 2, 2006 Today's Topic: ACM Announces 2005 A.M. Turing Award Winner ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACM has named Peter Naur the winner of the 2005 A.M. Turing Award, recognizing his pioneering work on defining the Algol 60 programming language. Algol 60 is the model for many later programming languages, including those that are indispensable software engineering tools today. The Turing Award, widely considered the "Nobel Prize of Computing," is named for British mathematician Alan M. Turing. First awarded in 1966, it carries a $100,000 prize, with financial support provided by Intel Corporation. Learn more about this year's A.M. Turing Award winner at: http://www.acm.org/2005_turing_award Dr. Naur was instrumental in establishing software engineering as a discipline. In 1960, Dr. Naur was editor of the hugely influential "Report on the Algorithmic Language Algol 60." He is recognized for the report's elegance, uniformity and coherence, and credited as an important contributor to the language's power and simplicity. The report made pioneering use of what later became known as Backus-Naur Form (BNF) to define the syntax of programs. BNF is now the standard way to define a computer language. Dr. Naur is also cited for his contribution to compiler design and to the art and practice of computer programming. ACM will present the Turing Award at the annual ACM Awards Banquet on May 20, 2006, in San Francisco, CA. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The ACM Bulletin Service provides ACM members with email notification of important association news and activities. Should you wish to be excluded from future issues of the acm-bulletin, please enter your email address [hidden email] at http://www.acm.org/acm_bulletin and we'll remove you. Association for Computing Machinery Advancing Computing as a Science and Profession (c) 2006 ACM, Inc. All rights reserved. attachment29.htm (4K) Download Attachment |
"Klaus D. Witzel" <[hidden email]> wrote...
>as you can see from the below, a grandfather of Smalltalk (Peter Naur: Algol, Backus-Naur-Form BNF) receives the 2005 Turing award. With all due respect to Peter Naur and his significant contributions to computer science, I'm not entirely comfortable with the characterization "Grandfather of Smalltalk". He is certainly grandfather of a lot of current programming technology but, as one who was present at the birth of Smalltalk, I can say that our entire focus was to provide a fundamentally different computing model from that of Algol. Alan Kay, in his History of Programming Languages article gives an excellent account of the genetic material that went into Smalltalk, and I would recommend that article to anyone who is interested in Squeak's intellectual lineage. - Dan |
Hi Dan,
on Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:47:15 +0100, you <[hidden email]> wrote: > "Klaus D. Witzel" <[hidden email]> wrote... > >> as you can see from the below, a grandfather of Smalltalk (Peter Naur: >> Algol, Backus-Naur-Form BNF) receives the 2005 Turing award. > > With all due respect to Peter Naur and his significant contributions to > computer science, I'm not entirely comfortable with the characterization > "Grandfather of Smalltalk". He is certainly grandfather of a lot of > current programming technology but, as one who was present at the birth > of Smalltalk, I can say that our entire focus was to provide a > fundamentally different computing model from that of Algol. Sure, that is what evolution is good for, at least :) Let me add that I respect your position, by all means. I was thinking about Algol->Simula->Smalltalk when I saw the grandfather relation. Hope you don't mind :) BTW: I'm keen to see whom ACM will credit the invention of virtual memory, or does anybody know that this was already done? /Klaus > Alan Kay, in his History of Programming Languages article gives an > excellent account of the genetic material that went into Smalltalk, and > I would recommend that article to anyone who is interested in Squeak's > intellectual lineage. > - Dan > > |
In reply to this post by Dan Ingalls
> Alan Kay, in his History of Programming Languages article gives > an excellent account of the genetic material that went into > Smalltalk, and I would recommend that article to anyone who is > interested in Squeak's intellectual lineage. > > - Dan available at: http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~ducasse/FreeBooks.html |
In reply to this post by Klaus D. Witzel
Hi, Klaus -
>Sure, that is what evolution is good for, at least :) Let me add that I respect your position, by all means. > >I was thinking about Algol->Simula->Smalltalk when I saw the grandfather relation. Hope you don't mind :) No problem. I get the perspective of *a* grandfather; I just wanted to put in a marker for any newbies who might have no idea where this all came from. - Dan By the way, there are lots of copies of Alan's article on line; here's the first I found: http://gagne.homedns.org/~tgagne/contrib/EarlyHistoryST.html |
Dan,
Do you know any pointer or reference to efforts done trying to follow the path drawn by smalltalk on building software outside the limits of Object Orientation ? I am interested in readings related with non-formal activities (with adults) trying to go forward declarative programming. I also feel that most of the limitations related with advances in OT and Smalltalk are related to adaption/adoption to common practices (OOLs) to smalltalk... I can´t found any papers or works realized outside formalisms, yet... 30 years later. Any guides or comments will be really appreciated. Ale. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Ingalls" <[hidden email]> To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: Turing Award Winner [was: Grandfather...] > Hi, Klaus - > > >Sure, that is what evolution is good for, at least :) Let me add that I respect your position, by all means. > > > >I was thinking about Algol->Simula->Smalltalk when I saw the grandfather relation. Hope you don't mind :) > > No problem. I get the perspective of *a* grandfather; I just wanted to put in a marker for any newbies who might have no idea where this all came from. > > - Dan > > By the way, there are lots of copies of Alan's article on line; here's the first I found: > > http://gagne.homedns.org/~tgagne/contrib/EarlyHistoryST.html > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |