Historic meeting for virtual worlds in virtual world

> An historic meeting took place today: representatives from 3 different
> virtual worlds met in a virtual world to hash out the details of how
> to bring the MMOX BOF IETF meeting into their respective virtual
> worlds and allow meeting participation from within them.
>
>
> Qwaq, OpenSim and SecondLife were all represented.
>
> Here's the chat log. A more readable summary is forthcoming:
>
>
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/MMOX/Chat_Logs/2009-2-19
>
>
>
> Lawson (Saijanai Kuhn in Second Life)
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>
> wiki page
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/MMOX

> Mark was there too, to rep OpenCroquet/Cobalt.
>
> Josh aka JuhJosh
>
>
> Lawson English wrote:
>  
>> An historic meeting took place today: representatives from 3 different
>> virtual worlds met in a virtual world to hash out the details of how
>> to bring the MMOX BOF IETF meeting into their respective virtual
>> worlds and allow meeting participation from within them.
>>
>>
>> Qwaq, OpenSim and SecondLife were all represented.
>>
>> Here's the chat log. A more readable summary is forthcoming:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/MMOX/Chat_Logs/2009-2-19
>>
>>
>>
>> Lawson (Saijanai Kuhn in Second Life)
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmox mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>>
>> wiki page
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/MMOX
>>    
>
>
>  

>
> On 19.02.2009, at 08:40, Lawson English wrote:
>
>> Four. Four virtual worlds...
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> Sorry about that. I wasn't sure of the distinction between Qwaq and
>> OpenCroquet/Cobalt.
>
>
> Well, both started with the Croquet SDK and built virtual worlds with
> it, which are clearly separate. What I'm unclear about (following only
> loosely) is not the distinction but the current commonalities. Is
> there still joint work happening on the Croquet core?