¿How stable is Squeak 3.9?

In other email i saw thath you speaks about the 3.10 release and 4.

Then, how stable is actually 3.9?

On 13.03.2006, at 17:53, Lord ZealoN wrote:

> In other email i saw thath you speaks about the 3.10 release and 4.
>
> Then, how stable is actually 3.9?
>

I think it's already quite usable... there are not many new bugs  
reported on
Mantis. I use it for my daily work.

We hope to be able to go beta soon.

On the todo list, we have as big items:

  -> Sync with SqueakLand
  -> Sync with SmallLand
  -> Some Traits related fixes
  -> Go over mantis once again to see if we missed anything
  -> Fix SqueakMap
  -> Sync with Networking Team for bugfixes.

     Marcus

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:04:28 +0100, Marcus Denker
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>On 13.03.2006, at 17:53, Lord ZealoN wrote:
>> Then, how stable is actually 3.9?
>>
>
>I think it's already quite usable...

Yup. I think that 3.9beta might be a good point to start forming the
3.10 team, so they can create a todo list, etcetera, and 3.9gamma
would then be the moment where the 3.10 team could kick off with the
first alpha.

And yes, I know that I need to kick the I/O team into action. I'm
almost done moving, after that it is my highest priority on my list.