Hi Folks -
I'd like to officially throw my hat in the ring for the coming election. And just like last year, I'll do that by trying to be clear where my personal focus will be for the next year: * Finalizing the SFC membership and the 4.0 release. Yes, we're *almost* there and there's even a small chance we might get things done before the election. But it ain't over 'til the fat lady sings, and we're not done yet. Plus there will be several follow-up activities, including an update to the election and/or membership process to discuss with the community. * More contributions. Even though I am happy with the contribution process so far, I am not satisfied with the number of contributors. Over the last year, I had hoped that some long-time contributors would start contributing again, but that largely hasn't happened. We need to expand the number of regular contributors if we want to be a feasible open source project in the long term. * Old projects adopting a new Squeak. Croquet/Cobalt is currently in the process of being ported back on top of current Squeak trunk. I'd like to see the same process started to get Etoys back. With an audience the size of the XO deployment we have a very interesting user base to serve and the combination of efforts can help both sides to progress faster. To sum it up, at this point you can pretty much expect "more of the same" from me. If you liked it last year, vote for me. If you didn't, well, then don't :-) Cheers, - Andreas |
Hello Andreas,
I'd like to thank you for the job you've done so far during your mandate. Your effort to move Squeak forward is noticeable and a clear improvement from my point of view. Does your upcoming nomination include a plan in regard to documentation, localization, deployment, and other incentives to attract more commercial developers to use Squeak? Questions that I'd be interested to read from every board member. :) Documentation is always a considerable factor in the adoption of a programming language, especially on commercial standpoint. I'd like to suggest a new documentation team to fit the bill. There is apparently no such team according to Squeak's team page. Ian. 2010/2/18 Andreas Raab <[hidden email]>: > Hi Folks - > > I'd like to officially throw my hat in the ring for the coming election. And > just like last year, I'll do that by trying to be clear where my personal > focus will be for the next year: > > * Finalizing the SFC membership and the 4.0 release. Yes, we're *almost* > there and there's even a small chance we might get things done before the > election. But it ain't over 'til the fat lady sings, and we're not done yet. > Plus there will be several follow-up activities, including an update to the > election and/or membership process to discuss with the community. > > * More contributions. Even though I am happy with the contribution process > so far, I am not satisfied with the number of contributors. Over the last > year, I had hoped that some long-time contributors would start contributing > again, but that largely hasn't happened. We need to expand the number of > regular contributors if we want to be a feasible open source project in the > long term. > > * Old projects adopting a new Squeak. Croquet/Cobalt is currently in the > process of being ported back on top of current Squeak trunk. I'd like to see > the same process started to get Etoys back. With an audience the size of the > XO deployment we have a very interesting user base to serve and the > combination of efforts can help both sides to progress faster. > > To sum it up, at this point you can pretty much expect "more of the same" > from me. If you liked it last year, vote for me. If you didn't, well, then > don't :-) > > Cheers, > - Andreas > > > > -- http://mecenia.blogspot.com/ |
In reply to this post by Andreas.Raab
Andreas Raab skrev 2010-02-18 06:01:
> Hi Folks - > > I'd like to officially throw my hat in the ring for the coming > election. And just like last year, I'll do that by trying to be clear > where my personal focus will be for the next year: > > * Finalizing the SFC membership and the 4.0 release. Yes, we're > *almost* there and there's even a small chance we might get things > done before the election. But it ain't over 'til the fat lady sings, > and we're not done yet. Plus there will be several follow-up > activities, including an update to the election and/or membership > process to discuss with the community. > > * More contributions. Even though I am happy with the contribution > process so far, I am not satisfied with the number of contributors. > Over the last year, I had hoped that some long-time contributors would > start contributing again, but that largely hasn't happened. We need to > expand the number of regular contributors if we want to be a feasible > open source project in the long term. > > * Old projects adopting a new Squeak. Croquet/Cobalt is currently in > the process of being ported back on top of current Squeak trunk. I'd > like to see the same process started to get Etoys back. With an > audience the size of the XO deployment we have a very interesting user > base to serve and the combination of efforts can help both sides to > progress faster. > probably meen I would contribute a little to the trunk too :-) Its a humongus job though, with two moving targets... > To sum it up, at this point you can pretty much expect "more of the > same" from me. If you liked it last year, vote for me. If you didn't, > well, then don't :-) I've been following the list and it's fun to see all the activity. Keep up the good work :-) Karl > > Cheers, > - Andreas > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |