Installing Seaside - 99.2% Green

> Nothing much to report.
>
> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>
> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com. ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>
> Test Runner says:
> 284 run, 282 passes
> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection

>
> 3.0*loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>
> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
> ConfigurationOfSeaside30-DaleHenrichs.139.
>
> Test Runner says:
> 1010 run, 1009 passes
> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>
> Seaside Installation:
> http://www.squeak.org/Documentation/Installation/#h-5
>
> Chris
>

> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>
>> Nothing much to report.
>>
>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>
>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>
>> Test Runner says:
>> 284 run, 282 passes
>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>
> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should open
> an issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing (though
> OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>
> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside
> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.

> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>
>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>
>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>
>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>
>>> Test Runner says:
>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>
>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should open an
>> issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing (though
>> OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>
>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside
>> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>
> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have Seaside
> run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>
>> So we can:
>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian
>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>
> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in
> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively putting up
> my hand here too?

> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>
>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>
>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>
>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>
>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should
>>> open an issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing
>>> (though OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>
>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside
>>> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>
>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have
>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>
>>> So we can:
>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian
>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>
>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in
>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively
>> putting up my hand here too?
>
> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and
> Seaside-Pharo-Core will be the same in less than a month IMHO.

> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>
>>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>>
>>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>>
>>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>>
>>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should open an
>>>> issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing (though
>>>> OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>>
>>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside
>>>> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>>
>>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have
>>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>>
>>>> So we can:
>>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
>>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian
>>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>>
>>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in
>>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively putting
>>> up my hand here too?
>>
>> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and Seaside-Pharo-Core
>> will be the same in less than a month IMHO.
>
> I don't follow the Pharo list: do they plan to do what we did with regards to
> Dictionary and Set? (Could we persuade them to?)

> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>>>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>>>
>>>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should
>>>>> open an issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing
>>>>> (though OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>>>
>>>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the
>>>>> Seaside developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have
>>>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>>>
>>>>> So we can:
>>>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
>>>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian
>>>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>>>
>>>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in
>>>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively
>>>> putting up my hand here too?
>>>
>>> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and
>>> Seaside-Pharo-Core will be the same in less than a month IMHO.
>>
>> I don't follow the Pharo list: do they plan to do what we did with
>> regards to Dictionary and Set? (Could we persuade them to?)
>
> Read this thread:
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-March/023289.html

> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>
>> Nothing much to report.
>>
>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>
>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com. ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>
>> Test Runner says:
>> 284 run, 282 passes
>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>
> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should open an
> issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing (though
> OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>
> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside
> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this. So we can:
> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian suggested)
> which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
> - create and maintain our own packager/builder/loader (as Lukas suggested).
> That would be copying all Pharo packages, and add these 2 methods to
> Seaside-Squeak-Core.
>
> The latter two would require a new repository, a maintainer and changing the
> Metacello configurations, so I'd go with the first option.

>
>
> Levente
>
>>
>> 3.0*loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>
>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>> ConfigurationOfSeaside30-DaleHenrichs.139.
>>
>> Test Runner says:
>> 1010 run, 1009 passes
>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>
>> Seaside Installation:
>> http://www.squeak.org/Documentation/Installation/#h-5
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
>