Hi Nicolas,
So apparently I have commit rights to the Xtreams repository! I took
advantage of that, and it now has the latest iteration of
XTInterleavedReadStream, having been beaten into much better shape by
Martin Kobetic's keen comments.
frank
On 16 November 2013 09:56, Frank Shearar <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Martin's already expressed the desire for ports to not be held up in
> their evolution, and we're fine-tuning the new stream's
> implementation.
>
> I suppose I'm asking: how would you like to consume these changes? The
> stream's generally useful, so _I_ think it should just go in
> Xtreams-Transforms. But that's just me :)
>
> frank
>
> On 15 November 2013 21:30, Nicolas Cellier
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>> I'm not sure to understand exactly what you want...
>> - integrate those extensions into an existing package?
>> - create a new package containing extensions?
>> - discuss about those options?
>> IMHO, the first option must be discussed with original authors, Martin and
>> Michael. Or did integration already happened in VW branch?
>> The second option must be discussed with the rest of the community.
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/14 Frank Shearar <
[hidden email]>
>>>
>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>
>>>
https://code.google.com/p/xtreams/issues/detail?id=3 has a reference
>>> to an interleaved stream - shall I just send a new mcz with the change
>>> your way?
>>>
>>> frank
>>
>>
Locked
