Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Is someone working with Log4s?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

8 messages Options

hernanmd

Dec 27, 2013; 9:53am

Is someone working with Log4s?

1675 posts

Because there is a missing method (#currentClassAndMethod) and author didn't replied. Maybe I am using it wrong

EsLogManager runForever: '[log4s]
debugEnabled=''true''
quietMode=''false''
globalLevel=''All''
;runForever=()
;runForever=''75'', ''7''
dailyRollingFileAppender=''TestDailyRollingFileAppender'', ''root'', ''dallyRollingFileTopOfDay.log'', ''false'', ''All'', '''', ''%-15d [dailyRollingFileAppenderTopOfDay] %-16m'', ''true'', ''topOfDay''
'

Cheers,

Hernán

jtuchel

Dec 27, 2013; 6:57pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

1922 posts

#currentClassAndMethod is VAST specific. It was added to VAST for log4s,
afaik.
I am quite sure Donald is interested in hearing about your problems with
it. Did you contact him just the other day or some time ago?

Joachim

Am 27.12.13 10:53, schrieb Hernán Morales Durand:

> Because there is a missing method (#currentClassAndMethod) and author
> didn't replied. Maybe I am using it wrong
>
> EsLogManager runForever: '[log4s]
> debugEnabled=''true''
> quietMode=''false''
> globalLevel=''All''
> ;runForever=()
> ;runForever=''75'', ''7''
> dailyRollingFileAppender=''TestDailyRollingFileAppender'', ''root'',
> ''dallyRollingFileTopOfDay.log'', ''false'', ''All'', '''', ''%-15d
> [dailyRollingFileAppenderTopOfDay] %-16m'', ''true'', ''topOfDay''
> '
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hernán
>

... [show rest of quote]

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:[hidden email]
Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de
D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com
Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1

dmacq

Dec 27, 2013; 7:07pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

126 posts

In reply to this post by hernanmd

Hernan,

The Visual Smalltalk method is this:

currentClassAndMethod

^Association
key: self class name asString
value: (Processor activeProcess methodAtFrame: 1) selector asString

I think the Pharo equivalent would be this:

currentClassAndMethod

^Association
key: self class name asString
value: Processor activeProcess name

Donald [|]

dmacq

Dec 28, 2013; 12:45pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

126 posts

What I posted before just gets the name of the process, not the name of the method that is currently executing. I don't know how to do that off the top of my head, but I will look into it this weekend.

Suggestions welcome.

Donald [|]

hernanmd

Dec 28, 2013; 3:42pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

1675 posts

Do not have a copy of VAST or VisualSmalltalk now but this could make it:

currentClassAndMethod

        ^Association
                key: self class name asString
                value: thisContext method selector

Hernán

2013/12/28 dmacq <[hidden email]>

What I posted before just gets the name of the process, not the name of the
method that is currently executing. I don't know how to do that off the top
of my head, but I will look into it this weekend.

Suggestions welcome.

Donald [|]

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-someone-working-with-Log4s-tp4732633p4732811.html

Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

hernanmd

Dec 28, 2013; 3:45pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

1675 posts

In reply to this post by jtuchel

Yes. I just posted because he could be on vacations time and didn't wanted to wait :)

Thanks,

Hernán

2013/12/27 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>

#currentClassAndMethod is VAST specific. It was added to VAST for log4s, afaik.
I am quite sure Donald is interested in hearing about your problems with it. Did you contact him just the other day or some time ago?

Joachim

Am 27.12.13 10:53, schrieb Hernán Morales Durand:

Because there is a missing method (#currentClassAndMethod) and author didn't replied. Maybe I am using it wrong

EsLogManager runForever: '[log4s]
debugEnabled=''true''
quietMode=''false''
globalLevel=''All''
;runForever=()
;runForever=''75'', ''7''
dailyRollingFileAppender=''TestDailyRollingFileAppender'', ''root'', ''dallyRollingFileTopOfDay.log'', ''false'', ''All'', '''', ''%-15d [dailyRollingFileAppenderTopOfDay] %-16m'', ''true'', ''topOfDay''
'

Cheers,

Hernán

... [show rest of quote]

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:[hidden email]
Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de
D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com
Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1

... [show rest of quote]

hernanmd

Dec 28, 2013; 4:45pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

1675 posts

In reply to this post by hernanmd

Actually, locationInfo could be directly thisContext as used by the log facilities methods:

EsLogManagerClass class>>logEvents

....

    index := (Time now asMilliSeconds rem: 6) + 1. "pseudo random number"
    message := messages at: index. "pick a random message"
    locationInfo := thisContext.
    ....

2013/12/28 Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]>

Do not have a copy of VAST or VisualSmalltalk now but this could make it:

currentClassAndMethod

        ^Association
                key: self class name asString
                value: thisContext method selector

Hernán

2013/12/28 dmacq <[hidden email]>

What I posted before just gets the name of the process, not the name of the
method that is currently executing. I don't know how to do that off the top
of my head, but I will look into it this weekend.

Suggestions welcome.

Donald [|]

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-someone-working-with-Log4s-tp4732633p4732811.html

Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

... [show rest of quote]

dmacq

Dec 29, 2013; 5:20pm

Re: Is someone working with Log4s?

126 posts

I would add asString like this:

currentClassAndMethod

^Association
key: self class name asString
value: thisContext method selector asString

But yes that is correct.

Thanks, Hernan.

Donald [|]