Issue 164 in metacello: Newbie observations on use of Metacello

Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Product-Core

New issue 164 by [hidden email]: Newbie observations on use of  
Metacello
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=164

Ben Coman makes some good points that shouldn't be lost:

   
http://forum.world.st/Newbie-observations-on-use-of-Metacello-tp4212946p4212946.html

Updates:
        Labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.32

Comment #1 on issue 164 by [hidden email]: Newbie observations on  
use of Metacello
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=164

(No comment was entered for this change.)

Comment #2 on issue 164 by [hidden email]: Newbie observations on  
use of Metacello
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=164

Summary of the post:

`Gofer project load:....` is getting close to something that would make  
better sense, but `Metacello load:....` might be a better alternative even  
though it might just be a cover for `Gofer project....`.

Ben lists a number of the Gofer project features that he likes[1]... Which  
makes think that the command line interface would gain from wrapping some  
of the MetacelloToolbox api, too.

Another advantage of `Metacello load:...` is that it would provide an  
opportunity for Metacello to have a presence in a base image ... which  
means that the ensureMetacello would be built-into all images ... which  
means a common superclass for configurations could be included .... worth  
thinking about a little bit

[1]  
http://forum.world.st/Newbie-observations-on-use-of-Metacello-tp4212946p4218364.html

Updates:
        Labels: -Product-Core Product-Script

Comment #3 on issue 164 by [hidden email]: Newbie observations on  
use of Metacello
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=164

(No comment was entered for this change.)