Smalltalk
›
Frameworks & Tools
›
Monticello, Metacello ...
›
Metacello
Search
everywhere
only in this topic
Advanced Search
Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)
‹
Previous Topic
Next Topic
›
Classic
List
Threaded
♦
♦
Locked
2 messages
metacello
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)
Status: Accepted
Owner:
[hidden email]
Labels: Type-Feature Priority-Medium Product-Core
New issue 166 by
[hidden email]
: Convention on platform package
naming (FAQ)
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=166
Sean DeNigris is satisifed with the naming convention he describes in this
post[1]. Probably worth documenting this as FAQ ...
[1]
http://forum.world.st/Convention-on-platform-e-g-Pharo1-3-vs-Pharo1-4-package-naming-tp4167422p4170616.html
metacello
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.32
Comment #1 on issue 166 by
[hidden email]
: Convention on platform
package naming (FAQ)
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=166
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Free forum by Nabble
Edit this page