Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)

metacello
Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Feature Priority-Medium Product-Core

New issue 166 by [hidden email]: Convention on platform package  
naming (FAQ)
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=166

Sean DeNigris is satisifed with the naming convention he describes in this  
post[1]. Probably worth documenting this as FAQ ...

[1]  
http://forum.world.st/Convention-on-platform-e-g-Pharo1-3-vs-Pharo1-4-package-naming-tp4167422p4170616.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 166 in metacello: Convention on platform package naming (FAQ)

metacello
Updates:
        Labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.32

Comment #1 on issue 166 by [hidden email]: Convention on platform  
package naming (FAQ)
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=166

(No comment was entered for this change.)