Hello all,
I am trying to use the 3.11-3 vm to see if it fixes my double return value problem, and I cannot get it to load the library to do the test =:0 At this point, I am just guessing. Can someone who has been successful at it give me an example? What is the .so file named, how do you refer to it in #moduleName, where do you put the file relative to the vm? Bill |
I think there is something wrong with the library searches in 3.11-3. It is one thing for my hacked together .so to avoid detection due to some mistake on my part, but has anyone tried ODBC on Linux with the new vm? It's sitting in /usr/lib like it has always been; the vm should find it, right?
Bill -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:57 AM To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; [hidden email] Subject: [Pharo-project] Linux 3.11-3 vm and shared libraries Hello all, I am trying to use the 3.11-3 vm to see if it fixes my double return value problem, and I cannot get it to load the library to do the test =:0 At this point, I am just guessing. Can someone who has been successful at it give me an example? What is the .so file named, how do you refer to it in #moduleName, where do you put the file relative to the vm? Bill _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Hi Bill,
I don't really understand what you're doing, too many mails in my inbox, I'm lost :) What simple test / code can I run to reproduce your problem and try to help you ? It seems interesting.
Cheers, Laurent Laffont On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]> wrote: I think there is something wrong with the library searches in 3.11-3. It is one thing for my hacked together .so to avoid detection due to some mistake on my part, but has anyone tried ODBC on Linux with the new vm? It's sitting in /usr/lib like it has always been; the vm should find it, right? |
Laurent,
Probably the best
starting point is to install the odbc package and use it to connect to a
datasource. Then load the new vm and see if breaks.
Thanks!!
Bill
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of laurent laffont Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:35 PM To: [hidden email] Cc: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Linux 3.11-3 vm and shared libraries I don't really understand what you're doing, too many mails in my inbox,
I'm lost :) What simple test / code can I run to reproduce your problem and try
to help you ? It seems interesting.
Cheers,
Laurent Laffont On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]>
wrote: I think there is something wrong with the library searches in 3.11-3. It is one thing for my hacked together .so to avoid detection due to some mistake on my part, but has anyone tried ODBC on Linux with the new vm? It's sitting in /usr/lib like it has always been; the vm should find it, right? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |