Live Coding Demonstration Success!

> Hi Squeakers,
>
> I just wanted to write in with a quick report on a recent demonstration
> I did for my my colleagues at work.
>
> At the company I work for we are given one Friday a month to work on any
> sort of project that interests us, whether or not it is related to the
> work we do for the company, and so I usually end up playing around with
> a project in Squeak. As part of the deal, we are asked to occasionally
> present what we are working on to our peers, in the hopes that they can
> do some learning from our projects as well.
>
> I didn't have any projects ready to demonstrate in a compelling way so I
> decided to instead just show off Squeak itself and give people kind of
> an introduction to Smalltalk and what I find so compelling about it. I
> decided to go ahead and live code a version of the bouncing atoms morph,
> using submorphs for the atoms, and developing the code as the parent
> morph "stepped" away on screen, updating its behavior seamlessly.  I
> demonstrated adding variables and method without stopping, changing the
> methods and debugging them when I made mistakes, changing the entire
> class of the onscreen morphs as the simulation ran and some of the cool
> things about the language itself as well, like "build-your-own" if
> statements and such.
>
> Overall I think that I kind of blew a bunch of people's minds, what with
> our day to day work being in C++ and always being in that
> edit-compile-run-test cycle. Several people came up to me afterwards to
> say how much they enjoyed seeing a different view of programming and
> what it could represent and I hope to put together a few more
> demonstrations in the coming months.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that Smalltalk is still surprising
> people and exceeding their expectations 35 years on, and a large part of
> it is thanks to all the great work that goes into Squeak from its
> contributors.
>
> Thanks for your efforts!
> Jeff
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 4:17 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Live Coding Demonstration Success!
>
> Yay! It's nice to hear stories like this.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> > Hi Squeakers,
> >
> > I just wanted to write in with a quick report on a recent
> > demonstration I did for my my colleagues at work.
> >
> > At the company I work for we are given one Friday a month to work on
> > any sort of project that interests us, whether or not it is related to
> > the work we do for the company, and so I usually end up playing around
> > with a project in Squeak. As part of the deal, we are asked to
> > occasionally present what we are working on to our peers, in the hopes
> > that they can do some learning from our projects as well.
> >
> > I didn't have any projects ready to demonstrate in a compelling way so
> > I decided to instead just show off Squeak itself and give people kind
> > of an introduction to Smalltalk and what I find so compelling about
> > it. I decided to go ahead and live code a version of the bouncing
> > atoms morph, using submorphs for the atoms, and developing the code as
> > the parent morph "stepped" away on screen, updating its behavior
> > seamlessly.  I demonstrated adding variables and method without
> > stopping, changing the methods and debugging them when I made
> > mistakes, changing the entire class of the onscreen morphs as the
> > simulation ran and some of the cool things about the language itself
> > as well, like "build-your-own" if statements and such.
> >
> > Overall I think that I kind of blew a bunch of people's minds, what
> > with our day to day work being in C++ and always being in that
> > edit-compile-run-test cycle. Several people came up to me afterwards
> > to say how much they enjoyed seeing a different view of programming
> > and what it could represent and I hope to put together a few more
> > demonstrations in the coming months.
> >
> > Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that Smalltalk is still
> > surprising people and exceeding their expectations 35 years on, and a
> > large part of it is thanks to all the great work that goes into Squeak
> > from its contributors.
> >
> > Thanks for your efforts!
> > Jeff
> >
>
>

> Hi Squeakers,
>
> I just wanted to write in with a quick report on a recent demonstration
> I did for my my colleagues at work.
>
> At the company I work for we are given one Friday a month to work on any
> sort of project that interests us, whether or not it is related to the
> work we do for the company, and so I usually end up playing around with
> a project in Squeak. As part of the deal, we are asked to occasionally
> present what we are working on to our peers, in the hopes that they can
> do some learning from our projects as well.
>
> I didn't have any projects ready to demonstrate in a compelling way so I
> decided to instead just show off Squeak itself and give people kind of
> an introduction to Smalltalk and what I find so compelling about it. I
> decided to go ahead and live code a version of the bouncing atoms morph,
> using submorphs for the atoms, and developing the code as the parent
> morph "stepped" away on screen, updating its behavior seamlessly.  I
> demonstrated adding variables and method without stopping, changing the
> methods and debugging them when I made mistakes, changing the entire
> class of the onscreen morphs as the simulation ran and some of the cool
> things about the language itself as well, like "build-your-own" if
> statements and such.
>
> Overall I think that I kind of blew a bunch of people's minds, what with
> our day to day work being in C++ and always being in that
> edit-compile-run-test cycle. Several people came up to me afterwards to
> say how much they enjoyed seeing a different view of programming and
> what it could represent and I hope to put together a few more
> demonstrations in the coming months.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that Smalltalk is still surprising
> people and exceeding their expectations 35 years on, and a large part of
> it is thanks to all the great work that goes into Squeak from its
> contributors.
>
> Thanks for your efforts!
> Jeff
>

>
> My main motivation in sharing my story was thinking back a few months to a
> discussion on the list where some of the regular Squeakers lamented feeling
> a bit down about the usage of squeak and the community surrounding it,
> feeling sort of like they were shouting into the void and no one was using
> the things being developed.  So I just wanted to share a small success story
> to let people know that their work is being used, seen, and appreciated out
> in the "real world" (whatever that means).
>
> Anyway, thanks again to everyone for all the work that has gone into Squeak,
> and I hope to write back again with an update on another successful demo!
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016, at 02:46 AM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
>
> "Will you be publishing this Package in the SqueakMap or somewhere?
> Could this work for other languages like
> Haskell to Smalltalk
> or
> Haskell to C to Smalltalk?"
> Yes I will publish it in github. Yes it can work for any language that gives
> access to memory mapped files . I will implement it also for python. I
> currently use sockets for this IPC , which allow me to use python libraries
> from pharo. But of course sockets are nowhere as fast as shared memory.
> However my implementation is not a magic pill and will need modifications to
> satisfy personal needs, but I plan to document it with a set of video
> tutorials that they will explain how it works. Currently you can use a C++
> library from pharo/squeak if you export it as a C library so it does not do
> name mangling , however my approach with memory mapped files does not allow
> you only to use C++ as a library but even "hack" inside executables and even
> store the live state of those executables together with the live state of
> your image. Essentially it will allows to run pharo with C++ side by side
> and interface between the two in many different ways.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:20 AM Kjell Godo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Will you be publishing this Package in the SqueakMap or somewhere?
> Could this work for other languages like
> Haskell to Smalltalk
> or
> Haskell to C to Smalltalk?
> I have thought about trying this but i don't do C or C++
> Although i did do a Bank kiosk in TurboC in the 1980s
> TuboC was nice     it was good
>
> i got scarred for life trying to use an early
> Microsoft C compiler
> in the mid 1980s
> that was just awrful
> people in that class at the UW were dropping like flies
> one girl was hiding under one of the tables in the lab on the final day
> the professor was getting pretty sick and tired
> of getting software handed in that didn't work
> so he was giving out zero grades for the class project to anyone
> who handed in a class project in Microsoft c
> that didn't work
> and i can tell you
> there were a lot of zeros handed out that day
> i think most of us got zeros
> even though we worked really hard
> using a c compiler that
> basically was pretty much just emitting
> random sequences of semi executable drivel
> i tried using the UNIX C compiler to get it going
> and then port it back to
> Microsoft c
> crashed and burned
> out of time
> no way hozay
> yyyyyyou get zero
> well if i was quick
> i would have gotten down on all fours
> and gone under the table with the girl
> she was a jolly Asian girl
> at least i could have gotten
> a pretty good quip out of the deal
>
> so
>
> i swore off of c
> right then and there
> i swore off of it
> for life
> the instant that zero hit
> the instant i could see zero coming and my name on it
> and no way to dodge it left
> just a helpless prisoner of war kneeling in the headlights
> with hands behind my head
> that moment when you just give up
> because haint nothing more you can do
> but just get hit
> and it's too late to cheat
> too late to band together with the cheaters and collaborate
> they probably all got zeroed out too anyway for being too similar
> or maybe the prof just rolled up his eyes up and over and back and said
> caint give every dang one of em a zero today
> and i swore that on my death bed i would say
> Haint touched it since
>
> but TurboC was pretty good
> yeah TurboC was almost Smalltalk like
> yeah TurboC was all right
> i made a bank kiosk out of
> TurboC and TurboProlog
> which was noted for being
> error free
>
> probably Borland figured that
> based on all our heinous experiences with c
> that building a C compiler that works
> a C compiler that actual works
> would be pretty near to a
> wide open blue ocean deal
> ie
> no competition exists
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 21, 2016, Dimitris Chloupis <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> Great job, I think they will be suprised even more that you can use
> smalltalk as scripting language for C++ projects which is currently what I
> do :)
> Though I am using pharo instead of squeak , there is little reason for the
> same concepts not to apply for squeak . I am actually trying to make a
> shared memory(based on memory mapped files)  frameworks where pharo shares
> memory with a c++ executable and they can talk to each other, shared data
> and live state and use each other's functions and libraries , sort of C++
> being pharo's best buddy and vice versa ;)
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:42 PM Jeff Gonis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Squeakers,
>
> I just wanted to write in with a quick report on a recent demonstration
> I did for my my colleagues at work.
>
> At the company I work for we are given one Friday a month to work on any
> sort of project that interests us, whether or not it is related to the
> work we do for the company, and so I usually end up playing around with
> a project in Squeak. As part of the deal, we are asked to occasionally
> present what we are working on to our peers, in the hopes that they can
> do some learning from our projects as well.
>
> I didn't have any projects ready to demonstrate in a compelling way so I
> decided to instead just show off Squeak itself and give people kind of
> an introduction to Smalltalk and what I find so compelling about it. I
> decided to go ahead and live code a version of the bouncing atoms morph,
> using submorphs for the atoms, and developing the code as the parent
> morph "stepped" away on screen, updating its behavior seamlessly.  I
> demonstrated adding variables and method without stopping, changing the
> methods and debugging them when I made mistakes, changing the entire
> class of the onscreen morphs as the simulation ran and some of the cool
> things about the language itself as well, like "build-your-own" if
> statements and such.
>
> Overall I think that I kind of blew a bunch of people's minds, what with
> our day to day work being in C++ and always being in that
> edit-compile-run-test cycle. Several people came up to me afterwards to
> say how much they enjoyed seeing a different view of programming and
> what it could represent and I hope to put together a few more
> demonstrations in the coming months.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that Smalltalk is still surprising
> people and exceeding their expectations 35 years on, and a large part of
> it is thanks to all the great work that goes into Squeak from its
> contributors.
>
> Thanks for your efforts!
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>