Looking for a working mailreader

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Looking for a working mailreader

Robert Withers
Is there such for squeak? I tried Celeste but it didn't load correctly.
I prefer all my tools tin squeak for immersion and full screen experience.

--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Looking for a working mailreader

Robert Withers
I guess it was left behind.

On 12/15/2015 06:09 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
> Is there such for squeak? I tried Celeste but it didn't load
> correctly. I prefer all my tools tin squeak for immersion and full
> screen experience.
>

--
. .. .. ^,^  robert

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Looking for a working mailreader

Jecel Assumpcao Jr
Robert Withers replied to self:
> I guess it was left behind.
>
> On 12/15/2015 06:09 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
> > Is there such for squeak? I tried Celeste but it didn't load
> > correctly. I prefer all my tools tin squeak for immersion and full
> > screen experience.

I am writing this reply in Celeste using a Squeak 4.1 image. I have not
tried loading Celeste in a newer image than that. I do have a small set
of fixes which I have not sent to be included in the official Celeste
because most of them are very wrong and were only enough to keep only
loading emails even though some were very broken.

-- Jecel


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Looking for a working mailreader

Robert Withers
In reply to this post by Robert Withers
That's unfortunate. I was hoping to hear of an updated stable version.

thanks,
robert

On 12/15/2015 06:16 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:

> Robert Withers replied to self:
>> I guess it was left behind.
>>
>> On 12/15/2015 06:09 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
>>> Is there such for squeak? I tried Celeste but it didn't load
>>> correctly. I prefer all my tools tin squeak for immersion and full
>>> screen experience.
> I am writing this reply in Celeste using a Squeak 4.1 image. I have not
> tried loading Celeste in a newer image than that. I do have a small set
> of fixes which I have not sent to be included in the official Celeste
> because most of them are very wrong and were only enough to keep only
> loading emails even though some were very broken.
>
> -- Jecel
>
>

--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert