Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

MCC questions

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 8 messages Options
Stéphane Ducasse-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

MCC questions

Stéphane Ducasse-3
hi bert

I would like to know
        - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
        - should all the packages be published in the same server?

Stef

Philippe Marschall
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

Philippe Marschall
2006/10/10, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> hi bert
>
> I would like to know
>         - if I can publish mcc files on a source?

Hit store, enter the filename, select a repository

>         - should all the packages be published in the same server?

No they can be on any repository in the list of repositories in the map.

Philippe

Bert Freudenberg
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

Bert Freudenberg
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse-3
Am 10.10.2006 um 15:30 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:

> hi bert
>
> I would like to know
> - if I can publish mcc files on a source?

You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe  
merged my support for this into your installation.

> - should all the packages be published in the same server?

Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config map.


- Bert -



stephane ducasse-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

stephane ducasse-2
Tx I really want to have a look at using that for all my small apps.

Stef

>
>> hi bert
>>
>> I would like to know
>> - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
>
> You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe  
> merged my support for this into your installation.

Philippe?

>
>> - should all the packages be published in the same server?
>
> Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config  
> map.
>
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>


stephane ducasse-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

stephane ducasse-2
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
Hi bert

I forgot. Sorry if you already say it: is the mcc format saving  
complete packages so just the differences on the server?

Stef

On 10 oct. 06, at 19:49, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> Am 10.10.2006 um 15:30 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
>
>> hi bert
>>
>> I would like to know
>> - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
>
> You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe  
> merged my support for this into your installation.
>
>> - should all the packages be published in the same server?
>
> Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config  
> map.
>
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>


Philippe Marschall
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

Philippe Marschall
2006/10/13, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> Hi bert
>
> I forgot. Sorry if you already say it: is the mcc format saving
> complete packages so just the differences on the server?

No, not at all.
A Monticello configuration map includes only the name, uuid (in newer
versions) and order of versions and a list of repositories. It's just
metainforamtion.
(Sorry, I know this explanation sucks)

It can be stored anywhere independently of the versions it references.

Its only a small and simple textfile. Open it with a text editor and
things will become much clearer.

Philippe.

> On 10 oct. 06, at 19:49, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> > Am 10.10.2006 um 15:30 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
> >
> >> hi bert
> >>
> >> I would like to know
> >>      - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
> >
> > You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe
> > merged my support for this into your installation.
> >
> >>      - should all the packages be published in the same server?
> >
> > Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config
> > map.
> >
> >
> > - Bert -
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


stephane ducasse-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

stephane ducasse-2
Tx I was confusing with mcd I guess.

Stef

On 13 oct. 06, at 21:52, Philippe Marschall wrote:

> 2006/10/13, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi bert
>>
>> I forgot. Sorry if you already say it: is the mcc format saving
>> complete packages so just the differences on the server?
>
> No, not at all.
> A Monticello configuration map includes only the name, uuid (in newer
> versions) and order of versions and a list of repositories. It's just
> metainforamtion.
> (Sorry, I know this explanation sucks)
>
> It can be stored anywhere independently of the versions it references.
>
> Its only a small and simple textfile. Open it with a text editor and
> things will become much clearer.
>
> Philippe.
>
>> On 10 oct. 06, at 19:49, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>> > Am 10.10.2006 um 15:30 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
>> >
>> >> hi bert
>> >>
>> >> I would like to know
>> >>      - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
>> >
>> > You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe
>> > merged my support for this into your installation.
>> >
>> >>      - should all the packages be published in the same server?
>> >
>> > Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config
>> > map.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Bert -
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>


Bert Freudenberg
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: MCC questions

Bert Freudenberg
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
Philippe is entirely correct. In fact, the entire MCC file is just a  
literal array without the # marks. You can create an actual  
configuration object by pasting "MCConfiguration fromArray: #" before  
it. Or, you can create a changeset that upgrades to a certain  
configuration like this:

(MCConfiguration fromArray: #(
    ... config here ...
)) upgrade

- Bert -

Am 13.10.2006 um 21:52 schrieb Philippe Marschall:

> 2006/10/13, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi bert
>>
>> I forgot. Sorry if you already say it: is the mcc format saving
>> complete packages so just the differences on the server?
>
> No, not at all.
> A Monticello configuration map includes only the name, uuid (in newer
> versions) and order of versions and a list of repositories. It's just
> metainforamtion.
> (Sorry, I know this explanation sucks)
>
> It can be stored anywhere independently of the versions it references.
>
> Its only a small and simple textfile. Open it with a text editor and
> things will become much clearer.
>
> Philippe.
>
>> On 10 oct. 06, at 19:49, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>> > Am 10.10.2006 um 15:30 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
>> >
>> >> hi bert
>> >>
>> >> I would like to know
>> >>      - if I can publish mcc files on a source?
>> >
>> > You mean, a squeaksource server? Yes, should work, I think Philippe
>> > merged my support for this into your installation.
>> >
>> >>      - should all the packages be published in the same server?
>> >
>> > Not necessarily, that's why you can add repositories to the config
>> > map.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Bert -
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>


Free forum by Nabble Edit this page