MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Bert Freudenberg
Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?

Two years ago we changed MCOrganizationDefinition>>description. Unfortunately, we did not apply this change to the to our squeaksource server image. Thus, some of the MCDs it generated were not quite right, they have somewhat different MCOrganizationDefinitions.

I now applied the single-line change to the server image, too, which appears to have fixed it.

My test case was the GetText package, which when compared to the package-cache reported a change, yet compared to the trunk repo reported no changes. Turned out the package cache had a GetText-fbs.33(fbs.28).mcd in it which indeed was slightly different from the proper GetText-fbs.33.mcz. After applying the fix and downloading that MCD again, there were no differences.

I now deleted all cached MCDs so they will be regenerated properly in the future. You may want to delete all MCDs from your local package cache, too. OTOH it's not that big a deal.

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Frank Shearar-3
On 15 August 2013 17:22, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?

These are those changes where the order of some categories changed?

frank

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Bert Freudenberg
On 15.08.2013, at 19:46, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 15 August 2013 17:22, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?
>
> These are those changes where the order of some categories changed?
>
> frank

The order is defined in these, too, yes ... which may or may not be an additional problem.

- Bert -


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Frank Shearar-3
On 15 August 2013 19:06, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 15.08.2013, at 19:46, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 15 August 2013 17:22, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?
>>
>> These are those changes where the order of some categories changed?
>>
>> frank
>
> The order is defined in these, too, yes ... which may or may not be an additional problem.

I often have merge conflicts in organizations, which is why I wondered.

frank

> - Bert -
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Bert Freudenberg

On 2013-08-15, at 20:12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 15 August 2013 19:06, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 15.08.2013, at 19:46, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 August 2013 17:22, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?
>>>
>>> These are those changes where the order of some categories changed?
>>>
>>> frank
>>
>> The order is defined in these, too, yes ... which may or may not be an additional problem.
>
> I often have merge conflicts in organizations, which is why I wondered.
>
> frank


This might be caused by the server introducing a change while making the mcd and you actually changing something, which then could result in a merge conflict.

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Levente Uzonyi-2
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?
>
> Two years ago we changed MCOrganizationDefinition>>description. Unfortunately, we did not apply this change to the to our squeaksource server image. Thus, some of the MCDs it generated were not quite right, they have somewhat different MCOrganizationDefinitions.
>
> I now applied the single-line change to the server image, too, which appears to have fixed it.

Sounds great. That bug was really annoying.


Levente

>
> My test case was the GetText package, which when compared to the package-cache reported a change, yet compared to the trunk repo reported no changes. Turned out the package cache had a GetText-fbs.33(fbs.28).mcd in it which indeed was slightly different from the proper GetText-fbs.33.mcz. After applying the fix and downloading that MCD again, there were no differences.
>
> I now deleted all cached MCDs so they will be regenerated properly in the future. You may want to delete all MCDs from your local package cache, too. OTOH it's not that big a deal.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MCOrganizationDefinition bug fixed, again

Chris Muller-3
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
Ohh, I hope preserving the order of categories is fixed..!

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 15.08.2013, at 19:46, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 15 August 2013 17:22, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Ever noticed spurious organization changes in MC?
>>
>> These are those changes where the order of some categories changed?
>>
>> frank
>
> The order is defined in these, too, yes ... which may or may not be an additional problem.
>
> - Bert -
>
>