Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

Missing snapshot: ST80-mt.184 plus MNU in updater

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 3 messages Options
fniephaus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Missing snapshot: ST80-mt.184 plus MNU in updater

fniephaus
Hi all,

Trunk hasn't been successfully built for a while. At the moment, 32-bit trunk fails because ST80-mt.184 seems missing [1] and 64bit trunk fails with an MNU in "MCMcmUpdater>>updateFromConfig:" with "UndefinedObject>>dependencies" [2].
It'd be great if someone could look into this.

Thanks,
Fabio
marcel.taeumel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Missing snapshot: ST80-mt.184 plus MNU in updater

marcel.taeumel
Hi, there.

ST80-mt.184 is in the Trunk and quite healthy:
http://source.squeak.org/trunk/ST80-mt.184.mcz

Best,
Marcel

Am 22.02.2018 08:31:09 schrieb Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]>:

Hi all,

Trunk hasn't been successfully built for a while. At the moment, 32-bit trunk fails because ST80-mt.184 seems missing [1] and 64bit trunk fails with an MNU in "MCMcmUpdater>>updateFromConfig:" with "UndefinedObject>>dependencies" [2].
It'd be great if someone could look into this.

Thanks,
Fabio





ST80-mt.184.mcz (448K) Download Attachment
fniephaus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Missing snapshot: ST80-mt.184 plus MNU in updater

fniephaus
Thanks for checking, Marcel. Maybe this was just a hick-up then.
Yesterday, the same build failed because `handlerContext` was `nil` in Exception>>retry (see 1).
Not sure why this is happening...


On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:56 AM Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi, there.

ST80-mt.184 is in the Trunk and quite healthy:

Best,
Marcel

Am 22.02.2018 08:31:09 schrieb Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]>:

Hi all,

Trunk hasn't been successfully built for a while. At the moment, 32-bit trunk fails because ST80-mt.184 seems missing [1] and 64bit trunk fails with an MNU in "MCMcmUpdater>>updateFromConfig:" with "UndefinedObject>>dependencies" [2].
It'd be great if someone could look into this.

Thanks,
Fabio
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page