Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

Monticello Versions and Bold Text

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Ramon Leon-5

Monticello Versions and Bold Text

Recently, I've been having problem in some images where Monticello no long
correctly bolds newer versions of code. After opening a repository, the
left column now shows all loaded packages as bold rather than just loaded
packages with newer versions available. The right column now bolds and
underlines the loaded package, rather than just bolding newer packages as it
did before. I have no idea why the sudden change, has anyone seen this
before?

Ramon Leon
http://onsmalltalk.com

Howard Stearns

Re: Monticello Versions and Bold Text

I don't know if it's related, but I've been having terrible problems
lately writing to to SqueakSource (other repositories are fine), and
some of those problems seem to involve confusion about dates.

Ramon Leon wrote:

> Recently, I've been having problem in some images where Monticello no long
> correctly bolds newer versions of code. After opening a repository, the
> left column now shows all loaded packages as bold rather than just loaded
> packages with newer versions available. The right column now bolds and
> underlines the loaded package, rather than just bolding newer packages as it
> did before. I have no idea why the sudden change, has anyone seen this
> before?
>
> Ramon Leon
> http://onsmalltalk.com
>
>

--
Howard Stearns
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
mailto:[hidden email]
jabber:[hidden email]
voice:+1-608-262-3724

Bert Freudenberg

Re: Monticello Versions and Bold Text

In reply to this post by Ramon Leon-5

On Jan 4, 2007, at 21:25 , Ramon Leon wrote:

> Recently, I've been having problem in some images where Monticello
> no long
> correctly bolds newer versions of code. After opening a
> repository, the
> left column now shows all loaded packages as bold rather than just
> loaded
> packages with newer versions available. The right column now bolds
> and
> underlines the loaded package, rather than just bolding newer
> packages as it
> did before. I have no idea why the sudden change, has anyone seen
> this
> before?

Which image, which MC, which ToolBuilder version? There have been
problems in the past, like when in 3.8 PluggableListMorph was
refactored.

- Bert -

Ramon Leon-4

Re: Monticello Versions and Bold Text

Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> On Jan 4, 2007, at 21:25 , Ramon Leon wrote:
>
>> Recently, I've been having problem in some images where Monticello no
>> long
>> correctly bolds newer versions of code. After opening a repository, the
>> left column now shows all loaded packages as bold rather than just
>> loaded
>> packages with newer versions available. The right column now bolds and
>> underlines the loaded package, rather than just bolding newer
>> packages as it
>> did before. I have no idea why the sudden change, has anyone seen this
>> before?
>
>
> Which image, which MC, which ToolBuilder version? There have been
> problems in the past, like when in 3.8 PluggableListMorph was refactored.
>
> - Bert -

It's a standard 3.8.1 image with Monticello 279, I haven't loaded
ToolBuilder. I've seen the same problem in some of my 3.9 images as well.

Travis Kay

Re: Monticello Versions and Bold Text

In reply to this post by Howard Stearns

I've seen similar issues with the recent Squeak Map / Package loader
updates.

Travis

On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:56:51 -0800, Howard Stearns <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I don't know if it's related, but I've been having terrible problems
> lately writing to to SqueakSource (other repositories are fine), and
> some of those problems seem to involve confusion about dates.
>
> Ramon Leon wrote:
>> Recently, I've been having problem in some images where Monticello no
>> long
>> correctly bolds newer versions of code. After opening a repository, the
>> left column now shows all loaded packages as bold rather than just
>> loaded
>> packages with newer versions available. The right column now bolds and
>> underlines the loaded package, rather than just bolding newer packages
>> as it
>> did before. I have no idea why the sudden change, has anyone seen this
>> before?
>> Ramon Leon
>> http://onsmalltalk.com
>