MoviePlayerMorph in 3.10

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MoviePlayerMorph in 3.10

Brad Fuller-2
Why this MoviePlayerMorph class removed in 3.10? It's in 3.8


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MoviePlayerMorph in 3.10

Edgar J. De Cleene



El 10/6/07 7:13 PM, "Brad Fuller" <[hidden email]> escribió:

> Why this MoviePlayerMorph class removed in 3.10? It's in 3.8
Brad:
3.10 plan is about one year soon.
One of goals is remove as much we could.
For the last time:
We wish smaller images yes or not ?
3.11 should be smaller ,so some of 3.10 and more of 3.8 is not on base
image.
But always you could load any you wish later or start with dev image.
I actualize my non official FunSqueak 3.10
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5988 as soon is possible.
Also I plan to have in this place "how to " load old things (to request) and
how to get 3.8.1 projects and OLPC projects working on 3.10.
So if you have some old not in FunSqueak 3.10, let me know.

Edgar



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MoviePlayerMorph in 3.10

Brad Fuller-2
Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

El 10/6/07 7:13 PM, "Brad Fuller" [hidden email] escribió:

  
Why this MoviePlayerMorph class removed in 3.10? It's in 3.8
    
Brad:
3.10 plan is about one year soon.
One of goals is remove as much we could.
For the last time:
We wish smaller images yes or not ?
3.11 should be smaller ,so some of 3.10 and more of 3.8 is not on base
image.
But always you could load any you wish later or start with dev image.
I actualize my non official FunSqueak 3.10
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5988 as soon is possible.
Also I plan to have in this place "how to " load old things (to request) and
how to get 3.8.1 projects and OLPC projects working on 3.10.
So if you have some old not in FunSqueak 3.10, let me know.
Thanks for the explanation, Edgar. Ok, so the reason it was removed was to reduce image size. That's great.
Things that are removed should have a way/place to easily bring it back.into your image. I didn't see it on Squeakmap, Universe or Squeaksource. I don't quite understand what you are saying about FunSqueak. Are you suggesting that I load FunSqueak and extract MoviePlayerMorph?


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MoviePlayerMorph in 3.10

Edgar J. De Cleene



El 10/7/07 12:27 PM, "Brad Fuller" <[hidden email]> escribió:

> Thanks for the explanation, Edgar. Ok, so the reason it was removed was to
> reduce image size. That's great.
> Things that are removed should have a way/place to easily bring it back.into
> your image. I didn't see it on Squeakmap, Universe or Squeaksource. I don't
> quite understand what you are saying about FunSqueak. Are you suggesting that
> I load FunSqueak and extract MoviePlayerMorph?

No, Brad.

FunSqueak plan to become a ready to run image not for developers, just for
newbie's have "a taste" of what Squeak was once and is now.

At the moment many orphans exist in Squeak and the process of going to
smaller images only show more.
I could rip more, like Nebraska.
I could do some old friends load again , like Fabrik , MorphicWrappers ,
MathMorphs, SqueakAmp.
I could put "recipes how to " for going from 3.8.1 or OLPC to 3.10 in the
swiki.
But I can't do all, my magic wand is short of energy now :=)

A postcard of your city or photo of you showing Squeak to neighbors kids
help a lot.

Edgar

P.S. Plans is to have new packages into Universes when 3.10 go out and we
start 3.11