Hi All,
Can anyone explain this behavior? Image 3.9 [7051] Win32 XP semaphore := Mutex new. [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. [101 to: 200 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. Results in: 1 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 Any ideas why? I have also tried semaphore := Semaphore forMutualExclusion. But get similar results. Thanks, Ron Teitelbaum |
Hello Ron,
Squeak does not have true closure by default (optional package exists) i is a temporary variable local in the context of definition of Blocks (here UndefinedObject>>DoIt) And a single temporary is allocated... You should try this: semaphore := Mutex new. [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. [101 to: 200 do: [:j | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: j]]] fork. Nicolas Ron Teitelbaum a écrit : > Hi All, > > Can anyone explain this behavior? > > Image 3.9 [7051] Win32 XP > > semaphore := Mutex new. > [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. > [101 to: 200 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. > > Results in: > > 1 > 102 > 103 > 104 > 105 > 106 > 107 > 108 > 109 > 110 > 111 > 112 > 113 > 114 > 115 > 116 > 117 > 118 > 119 > 120 > 121 > 122 > 123 > 124 > 125 > 126 > 127 > 128 > 129 > 130 > 131 > 132 > 133 > 134 > 135 > 136 > 137 > 138 > 139 > 140 > 141 > 142 > 143 > 144 > 145 > 146 > 147 > 148 > 149 > 150 > 151 > 152 > 153 > 154 > 155 > 156 > 157 > 158 > 159 > 160 > 161 > 162 > 163 > 164 > 165 > 166 > 167 > 168 > 169 > 170 > 171 > 172 > 173 > 174 > 175 > 176 > 177 > 178 > 179 > 180 > 181 > 182 > 183 > 184 > 185 > 186 > 187 > 188 > 189 > 190 > 191 > 192 > 193 > 194 > 195 > 196 > 197 > 198 > 199 > 200 > > Any ideas why? > I have also tried semaphore := Semaphore forMutualExclusion. But get > similar results. > > Thanks, > > Ron Teitelbaum > > > > |
In reply to this post by Ron Teitelbaum
I think the current Squeak compiler allocates block arguments and temps
in the same context as the block is created in. Try naming the two block arguments differently: semaphore := Mutex new. [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. [101 to: 200 do: [:j | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: j]]] fork. Other options include sending fixTemps to the blocks to ensure that their temporary variables are actually different. David |
Thanks! It got me again!!
Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: David Shaffer [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:43 PM > To: [hidden email]; The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Subject: Re: Mutex error? > > I think the current Squeak compiler allocates block arguments and temps > in the same context as the block is created in. Try naming the two > block arguments differently: > > semaphore := Mutex new. > [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. > [101 to: 200 do: [:j | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: j]]] > fork. > > Other options include sending fixTemps to the blocks to ensure that their > temporary variables are actually different. > > David > > |
I have a stroke list at work for every time it gets me.
Philippe 2007/2/19, Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]>: > Thanks! It got me again!! > > Ron > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Shaffer [mailto:[hidden email]] > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:43 PM > > To: [hidden email]; The general-purpose Squeak developers list > > Subject: Re: Mutex error? > > > > I think the current Squeak compiler allocates block arguments and temps > > in the same context as the block is created in. Try naming the two > > block arguments differently: > > > > semaphore := Mutex new. > > [1 to: 100 do: [:i | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: i]]] fork. > > [101 to: 200 do: [:j | semaphore critical:[ Transcript cr; show: j]]] > > fork. > > > > Other options include sending fixTemps to the blocks to ensure that their > > temporary variables are actually different. > > > > David > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |