NativeBoost

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

NativeBoost

CdAB63
Just wondering: wouldn't be nice to have a port of Native Boost for squeak?

CdAB

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NativeBoost

Hannes Hirzel
Yes, that would be desirable.

There is some earlier discussion in 2012 by and with Igor S. in the
mail archive where he indicates what would need to be done.

--Hannes

On 2/20/13, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Just wondering: wouldn't be nice to have a port of Native Boost for squeak?
>
> CdAB
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NativeBoost

Igor Stasenko
It is related to changes to primitive simulation support, which we
extended in Pharo.
We're added a registration mechanism in debugger to allow external
packages to register own primitive simulators (which is one of
requirements for NB to simulate its primitive properly).

Apart from that (that you cannot correctly debug the method with NB
primitive), everything else
should just work , granting you using VM with NB plugin.

On 20 February 2013 19:24, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes, that would be desirable.
>
> There is some earlier discussion in 2012 by and with Igor S. in the
> mail archive where he indicates what would need to be done.
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 2/20/13, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Just wondering: wouldn't be nice to have a port of Native Boost for squeak?
>>
>> CdAB
>>
>>
>



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.