Me thinks that method needs this example: -80538738812075974 cubed + 80435758145817515 cubed + 12602123297335631 cubed - Bert - |
:-)
(Yay, Squeak beats Google: ) Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2019 22:29:23 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: [squeak-dev] Number>>cubed
Me thinks that method needs this example:
-80538738812075974 cubed + 80435758145817515 cubed + 12602123297335631 cubed
- Bert -
Carpe Squeak!
|
I have unpublished acceleration for cubed and cube-root too I think. For now cubed was in EToys, so should we move it to Kernel-Numbers? Le mer. 23 oct. 2019 à 23:21, Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
> On 2019-10-23, at 2:29 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I have unpublished acceleration for cubed and cube-root too I think. Stomp on that pedal! > For now cubed was in EToys, so should we move it to Kernel-Numbers? Certainly tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful Latin Phrases:- Te precor dulcissime supplex! = Pretty please with a cherry on top! |
#cubed appears to have no real senders - why don't you put the acceleration into #raisedTo: instead? Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von tim Rowledge <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2019 23:37:40 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Number>>cubed > On 2019-10-23, at 2:29 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I have unpublished acceleration for cubed and cube-root too I think. Stomp on that pedal! > For now cubed was in EToys, so should we move it to Kernel-Numbers? Certainly tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful Latin Phrases:- Te precor dulcissime supplex! = Pretty please with a cherry on top!
Carpe Squeak!
|
Hi Christoph, because I have played with binary-ternary expansion of the power (raisedToInteger:) so needed squared and cubed Le mer. 23 oct. 2019 à 23:47, Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by timrowledge
With integer factorization it looks even more like black magic! b := 80435758145817515. c := 12602123297335631. a factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 1 1) values: #(2 1545949 26048316863) b factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 1 1 1) values: #(5 7 59753 38461073393) c factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 1 1) values: #(463 7607 3578073991) (b-a) factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 1 1 1 1) values: #(-1 11 43 215921 1008323) (a*b+b squared + a squared) factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 1) values: #(1774113869131 10954535947520123161981) ((b-a)*(a*b+b squared + a squared)-42) factors. a RunArray runs: #(1 3 3 3) values: #(-1 463 7607 3578073991) Le mer. 23 oct. 2019 à 23:37, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by Christoph Thiede
As a math lover, I would suggest that example instead!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXhzZAem7k0
On 2019-10-23 17:21, Thiede, Christoph
wrote:
-- ----------------- Beno?t St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth GitHub: bstjean Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |