OCompletion in 4.3?
Locked
 
|
I downloaded 4.3 and tried to follow the instructions in "How to extend the system" workspace for installing OCompletion:
(Installer ss project: 'OCompletion') install: 'Ocompletion'. appears to work. (Smalltalk at: #ECToolSet) register. fails with 'Key not found: ECToolSet' Any suggestions much appreciated. Doug |
|
|
ECTools was moved to OcompletionSqueakCompatibilty. You have to install: it as well
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Douglas McPherson <[hidden email]> wrote: > I downloaded 4.3 and tried to follow the instructions in "How to extend the system" workspace for installing OCompletion: > (Installer ss project: 'OCompletion') install: 'Ocompletion'. > appears to work. > (Smalltalk at: #ECToolSet) register. > fails with 'Key not found: ECToolSet' > Any suggestions much appreciated. > Doug |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, John McKeon wrote:
> ECTools was moved to OcompletionSqueakCompatibilty. You have to install: it as well Or just use the Metacello configuration. Levente > > On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Douglas McPherson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I downloaded 4.3 and tried to follow the instructions in "How to extend the system" workspace for installing OCompletion: > > (Installer ss project: 'OCompletion') install: 'Ocompletion'. > > appears to work. > > (Smalltalk at: #ECToolSet) register. > > fails with 'Key not found: ECToolSet' > > Any suggestions much appreciated. > > Doug > |
|
|
Excuse my naivety, but how exactly do I use the Metacello configuration?
Thanks! Doug On Mar 3, 2012, at 17:30 , Levente Uzonyi wrote: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, John McKeon wrote: > >> ECTools was moved to OcompletionSqueakCompatibilty. You have to install: it as well > > Or just use the Metacello configuration. > > > Levente > >> On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Douglas McPherson <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > I downloaded 4.3 and tried to follow the instructions in "How to extend the system" workspace for installing OCompletion: >> > (Installer ss project: 'OCompletion') install: 'Ocompletion'. >> > appears to work. >> > (Smalltalk at: #ECToolSet) register. >> > fails with 'Key not found: ECToolSet' >> > Any suggestions much appreciated. >> > Doug > |
Re: OCompletion in 4.3?
|
|
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Douglas McPherson <[hidden email]> wrote: Excuse my naivety, but how exactly do I use the Metacello configuration? Read the Pharo By Example chapter, it will help you: https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28462/Metacello.pdf Metacello is decoupled from Pharo. Cheers
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com |
|
|
Guys, trying to educate the mass is very nice, but couldn't we agree to just put the magical incantation in the squeaksource page of each project?
Personally, I just can't remember it... Having to go and look in a book, be it electronic, is rather unfriendly. And I hope there is a #stable version too... Because having to browse the ConfigurationOf... to guess which version would fit is also boring. It is diverting us from our root goal, loading this damned package. This is one problem Metacello is supposed to resolve, no? Nicolas Le 4 mars 2012 18:54, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
|
|
So, it would be
Installer ss project: 'MetacelloRepository'; install: 'ConfigurationOfOCompletion'. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOCompletion) project version: #stable) load or: Gofer new squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; package: 'ConfigurationOfOCompletion'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOCompletion) project version: #stable) load Installer or Gofer just load the latest ConfigurationOfOCompletion from the squeaksource MetacelloRepository. Alternatively, you can perform this first sentence manually from a Monticello browser. Then ConfigurationOfOCompletion is a description of the different versions of OCompletion for different dialects, as long as the project dependencies. The second sentence will load Metacello, a tool being able to interpret above specification and transform it into true package load commands. If ever the #stable version does not exist, you'll get a notification. Then it is possible to try other versions, whose description lie in ConfigurationOfOCompletion. There is also the possibility to load bleedingEdge, or latestVersion... ConfigurationOfOCompletion project bleedingEge load. ConfigurationOfOCompletion project latestVersion load. Beware, specifying a String or Symbol version differs... 'stable' is not #stable. Nicolas Le 4 mars 2012 23:00, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> a écrit : Guys, trying to educate the mass is very nice, but couldn't we agree to just put the magical incantation in the squeaksource page of each project? |
|
|
All, thanks very much. It turns out as forewarned that the #stable version does not exist for Squeak 4.3, however ConfigurationOfOCompletion project latestVersion load seemed to work. However, Levente mentioned specifically OCompletionSqueakCompatability, but that package is not loaded by the above. Not sure if this is an issue or not. Also, I noticed that neither OcompletionTests or Ocompletion-Tests are loaded. Which, if either, of these is relevant? Thanks again. Doug On Mar 4, 2012, at 14:17 , Nicolas Cellier wrote: So, it would be |
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Nicolas Cellier
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Guys, trying to educate the mass is very nice, but couldn't we agree to just > put the magical incantation in the squeaksource page of each project? > Personally, I just can't remember it... > Having to go and look in a book, be it electronic, is rather unfriendly. Better yet, put the magical incantation as a script on SqueakMap so we don't even have to go to the web browser. It is precisely its purpose, but we keep forgetting so these countless discussions... > And I hope there is a #stable version too... Because having to browse the If package maintainers would apply the documented SqueakMap conventions for publishing, http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6182 then there would be a fixed-configuration Release for a particular version of Squeak plus a 'head' release which is a trunk-like process for on-going development. > ConfigurationOf... to guess which version would fit is also boring. It is > diverting us from our root goal, loading this damned package. > This is one problem Metacello is supposed to resolve, no? No, SqueakMap is supposed to be the system that documents how to load things for Squeak. |
«
Return to Squeak - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |