Hi Dave,
AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog r.2678 VM. Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make sure the AioPlugin is present? Thanks, frank |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote:
> Hi Dave, > > AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that > prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. > > Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, > AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog > r.2678 VM. > > Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make > sure the AioPlugin is present? > > Thanks, > > frank The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in his next build ;-) But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so that it will be possible to handle the Warning. After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior to running the unit tests: [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] on: Warning do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] Dave |
On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that >> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. >> >> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, >> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog >> r.2678 VM. >> >> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make >> sure the AioPlugin is present? >> >> Thanks, >> >> frank > > The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: > > AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true > > If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in > his next build ;-) > > But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use > #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so > that it will be possible to handle the Warning. > > After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior > to running the unit tests: > > [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] > on: Warning > do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] > > Dave Thanks, Dave. That did the trick! http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools to run the test suite. Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! frank |
On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that >>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. >>> >>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, >>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog >>> r.2678 VM. >>> >>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make >>> sure the AioPlugin is present? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> frank >> >> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: >> >> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true >> >> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in >> his next build ;-) >> >> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use >> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so >> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. >> >> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior >> to running the unit tests: >> >> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] >> on: Warning >> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] >> >> Dave > > Thanks, Dave. > > That did the trick! > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses > InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools > to run the test suite. > > Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know > what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my script does not care about missing source! http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio tests all failing, as they should. frank > It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long > ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer > have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! > > frank |
On 12 February 2013 10:33, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> >>>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that >>>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. >>>> >>>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, >>>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog >>>> r.2678 VM. >>>> >>>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make >>>> sure the AioPlugin is present? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> frank >>> >>> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: >>> >>> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true >>> >>> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in >>> his next build ;-) >>> >>> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use >>> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so >>> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. >>> >>> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior >>> to running the unit tests: >>> >>> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] >>> on: Warning >>> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] >>> >>> Dave >> >> Thanks, Dave. >> >> That did the trick! >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses >> InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools >> to run the test suite. >> >> Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know >> what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. > > *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going > to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my > script does not care about missing source! > > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio > tests all failing, as they should. http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/5/ Actually, shouldn't a bunch of these tests be passing? Did I mess up something? I'm taking a Trunk, loading the HudsonBuildTools in, and then running this: Installer squeakmap update; addPackage: 'OSProcess (head)'; install. [(Smalltalk at: #AioEventHandler) aioPluginPresent] on: Warning do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ]. HDTestReport runPackage: 'OSProcess-Tests'. "Throw away the dirty image." WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ SmalltalkImage current snapshot: false andQuit: true ]. > frank > >> It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long >> ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer >> have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! >> >> frank |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:27:39PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 10:33, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: > >>>> Hi Dave, > >>>> > >>>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that > >>>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. > >>>> > >>>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, > >>>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog > >>>> r.2678 VM. > >>>> > >>>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make > >>>> sure the AioPlugin is present? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> frank > >>> > >>> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: > >>> > >>> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true > >>> > >>> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in > >>> his next build ;-) > >>> > >>> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use > >>> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so > >>> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. > >>> > >>> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior > >>> to running the unit tests: > >>> > >>> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] > >>> on: Warning > >>> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] > >>> > >>> Dave > >> > >> Thanks, Dave. > >> > >> That did the trick! > >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses > >> InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools > >> to run the test suite. > >> > >> Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know > >> what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. > > > > *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going > > to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my > > script does not care about missing source! > > > > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio > > tests all failing, as they should. > > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/5/ > > Actually, shouldn't a bunch of these tests be passing? Did I mess up > something? I'm taking a Trunk, loading the HudsonBuildTools in, and > then running this: Try running it in your own image to see what passes. Many of the tests will fail on a Cog VM, primarily because of limitations of #forkSqueak on Cog (forkSqueak is heavily used for testing interprocess things), but also because of one or two issues in the plugin. These are actual failures, so don't expect the tests to pass. That does not mean you cannot use OSProcess on Cog, it just means that the full test suite will not pass. The Aio tests should pass on Cog if the plugin is present. Dave > > Installer squeakmap > update; > addPackage: 'OSProcess (head)'; > install. > > [(Smalltalk at: #AioEventHandler) aioPluginPresent] > on: Warning > do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ]. > > HDTestReport runPackage: 'OSProcess-Tests'. > > "Throw away the dirty image." > WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ SmalltalkImage current snapshot: > false andQuit: true ]. > > > > frank > > > >> It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long > >> ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer > >> have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! > >> > >> frank |
On 12 February 2013 16:55, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:27:39PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> On 12 February 2013 10:33, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >>>> Hi Dave, >> >>>> >> >>>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that >> >>>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. >> >>>> >> >>>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, >> >>>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog >> >>>> r.2678 VM. >> >>>> >> >>>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make >> >>>> sure the AioPlugin is present? >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> >> >>>> frank >> >>> >> >>> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: >> >>> >> >>> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true >> >>> >> >>> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in >> >>> his next build ;-) >> >>> >> >>> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use >> >>> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so >> >>> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. >> >>> >> >>> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior >> >>> to running the unit tests: >> >>> >> >>> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] >> >>> on: Warning >> >>> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] >> >>> >> >>> Dave >> >> >> >> Thanks, Dave. >> >> >> >> That did the trick! >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses >> >> InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools >> >> to run the test suite. >> >> >> >> Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know >> >> what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. >> > >> > *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going >> > to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my >> > script does not care about missing source! >> > >> > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio >> > tests all failing, as they should. >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/5/ >> >> Actually, shouldn't a bunch of these tests be passing? Did I mess up >> something? I'm taking a Trunk, loading the HudsonBuildTools in, and >> then running this: > > Try running it in your own image to see what passes. Many of the tests > will fail on a Cog VM, primarily because of limitations of #forkSqueak > on Cog (forkSqueak is heavily used for testing interprocess things), but > also because of one or two issues in the plugin. These are actual failures, > so don't expect the tests to pass. That does not mean you cannot use > OSProcess on Cog, it just means that the full test suite will not pass. > > The Aio tests should pass on Cog if the plugin is present. Well, I also get 81 failures on my machine (running on the same Cog). Which doesn't surprise me, since they're being driven off the same script. But the script doesn't look obviously wrong? frank > Dave > >> >> Installer squeakmap >> update; >> addPackage: 'OSProcess (head)'; >> install. >> >> [(Smalltalk at: #AioEventHandler) aioPluginPresent] >> on: Warning >> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ]. >> >> HDTestReport runPackage: 'OSProcess-Tests'. >> >> "Throw away the dirty image." >> WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ SmalltalkImage current snapshot: >> false andQuit: true ]. >> >> >> > frank >> > >> >> It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long >> >> ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer >> >> have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! >> >> >> >> frank > |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:42:13PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 16:55, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:27:39PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: > >> On 12 February 2013 10:33, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: > >> >>>> Hi Dave, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that > >> >>>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, > >> >>>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog > >> >>>> r.2678 VM. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make > >> >>>> sure the AioPlugin is present? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> frank > >> >>> > >> >>> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: > >> >>> > >> >>> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true > >> >>> > >> >>> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in > >> >>> his next build ;-) > >> >>> > >> >>> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use > >> >>> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so > >> >>> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. > >> >>> > >> >>> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior > >> >>> to running the unit tests: > >> >>> > >> >>> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] > >> >>> on: Warning > >> >>> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] > >> >>> > >> >>> Dave > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, Dave. > >> >> > >> >> That did the trick! > >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses > >> >> InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools > >> >> to run the test suite. > >> >> > >> >> Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know > >> >> what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. > >> > > >> > *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going > >> > to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my > >> > script does not care about missing source! > >> > > >> > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio > >> > tests all failing, as they should. > >> > >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/5/ > >> > >> Actually, shouldn't a bunch of these tests be passing? Did I mess up > >> something? I'm taking a Trunk, loading the HudsonBuildTools in, and > >> then running this: > > > > Try running it in your own image to see what passes. Many of the tests > > will fail on a Cog VM, primarily because of limitations of #forkSqueak > > on Cog (forkSqueak is heavily used for testing interprocess things), but > > also because of one or two issues in the plugin. These are actual failures, > > so don't expect the tests to pass. That does not mean you cannot use > > OSProcess on Cog, it just means that the full test suite will not pass. > > > > The Aio tests should pass on Cog if the plugin is present. > > Well, I also get 81 failures on my machine (running on the same Cog). > Which doesn't surprise me, since they're being driven off the same > script. But the script doesn't look obviously wrong? The script looks reasonable enough to me. The only thing I would say is that if you want to focus on OSProcess test coverage, then you would need to run it on an interpreter VM. The OSProcess and CommandShell tests will normally all pass, except for occasional intermittent failures on one or two of the interprocess tests. It's possible that these occasional intermittent failures might be more or less common on another machine, or maybe you will never see any failures at all ... I'd be interested to see how it looks on the CI server. Dave > > frank > > > Dave > > > >> > >> Installer squeakmap > >> update; > >> addPackage: 'OSProcess (head)'; > >> install. > >> > >> [(Smalltalk at: #AioEventHandler) aioPluginPresent] > >> on: Warning > >> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ]. > >> > >> HDTestReport runPackage: 'OSProcess-Tests'. > >> > >> "Throw away the dirty image." > >> WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ SmalltalkImage current snapshot: > >> false andQuit: true ]. > >> > >> > >> > frank > >> > > >> >> It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long > >> >> ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer > >> >> have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! > >> >> > >> >> frank > > |
On 12 February 2013 18:40, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:42:13PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> On 12 February 2013 16:55, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:27:39PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >> On 12 February 2013 10:33, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > On 12 February 2013 10:18, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> On 12 February 2013 00:34, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:44:42PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >> >>>> Hi Dave, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> AioEventHandler >> #aioPluginPresent pops up a modal dialog that >> >> >>>> prevents me from writing an automated job to run OSProcess' tests. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Obviously it's doing that because I have 'AioPlugin not present, >> >> >>>> AioEventHandler will use polling input'. I'm running this on a Cog >> >> >>>> r.2678 VM. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Is there a way to avoid this dialog popping up? Or, how can I make >> >> >>>> sure the AioPlugin is present? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> frank >> >> >>> >> >> >>> The test to check if AioPlugin is present is: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent ==> true >> >> >>> >> >> >>> If you ask Eliot nicely, he might be persuaded to include AioPlugin in >> >> >>> his next build ;-) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> But that will not help your immediate problem, so I changed it to use >> >> >>> #notify: rather than #inform: in AioEventHandler>>aioPluginPresent so >> >> >>> that it will be possible to handle the Warning. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> After updating to latest OSProcess you should be able to do this prior >> >> >>> to running the unit tests: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> [AioEventHandler aioPluginPresent] >> >> >>> on: Warning >> >> >>> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ] >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Dave >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, Dave. >> >> >> >> >> >> That did the trick! >> >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/ uses >> >> >> InstallerSqueakMap to load the (head) release and the HudsonBuildTools >> >> >> to run the test suite. >> >> >> >> >> >> Unfortunately something's going wrong with the build and I don't know >> >> >> what: the image must be displaying a dialog of some kind. >> >> > >> >> > *cough* Yes, a "I can't find my sources file, halp!" dialog. I'm going >> >> > to file a bug report for that. Fine, warn a user, by all means. But my >> >> > script does not care about missing source! >> >> > >> >> > http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/3/ shows the Aio >> >> > tests all failing, as they should. >> >> >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-OSProcess/5/ >> >> >> >> Actually, shouldn't a bunch of these tests be passing? Did I mess up >> >> something? I'm taking a Trunk, loading the HudsonBuildTools in, and >> >> then running this: >> > >> > Try running it in your own image to see what passes. Many of the tests >> > will fail on a Cog VM, primarily because of limitations of #forkSqueak >> > on Cog (forkSqueak is heavily used for testing interprocess things), but >> > also because of one or two issues in the plugin. These are actual failures, >> > so don't expect the tests to pass. That does not mean you cannot use >> > OSProcess on Cog, it just means that the full test suite will not pass. >> > >> > The Aio tests should pass on Cog if the plugin is present. >> >> Well, I also get 81 failures on my machine (running on the same Cog). >> Which doesn't surprise me, since they're being driven off the same >> script. But the script doesn't look obviously wrong? > > The script looks reasonable enough to me. The only thing I would say is that > if you want to focus on OSProcess test coverage, then you would need to run > it on an interpreter VM. > > The OSProcess and CommandShell tests will normally all pass, except for > occasional intermittent failures on one or two of the interprocess tests. > It's possible that these occasional intermittent failures might be more or > less common on another machine, or maybe you will never see any failures > at all ... I'd be interested to see how it looks on the CI server. Ideally I'd run the test suite on all VMs on all platforms, but I don't quite know how to set up the slicing and dicing of the matrix in a clean fashion. Maybe I should take the lemon of 81 failing tests [1] and make multiVM lemonade? [1] I'm really not pointing fingers; I just couldn't resist the proverb mangling. frank > Dave > >> >> frank >> >> > Dave >> > >> >> >> >> Installer squeakmap >> >> update; >> >> addPackage: 'OSProcess (head)'; >> >> install. >> >> >> >> [(Smalltalk at: #AioEventHandler) aioPluginPresent] >> >> on: Warning >> >> do: [ "ignore the one-time warning dialog" ]. >> >> >> >> HDTestReport runPackage: 'OSProcess-Tests'. >> >> >> >> "Throw away the dirty image." >> >> WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ SmalltalkImage current snapshot: >> >> false andQuit: true ]. >> >> >> >> >> >> > frank >> >> > >> >> >> It turns out that my recent script hacking builds on work done long >> >> >> ago: people like Nicolas Cellier and Keith Hodges and Matthew Fulmer >> >> >> have their initials all over the Installer stuff. Thanks, guys! >> >> >> >> >> >> frank >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |