Hi David,
I am creating the Metacello configuration of OSProcess but I don't know what versions are stable. Should I take the last ones in the squeaksource repository of OSProcess: OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz Tests-OSProcess-dtl.20.mcz or the last released: OSProcess-dtl.36.mcz Tests-OSProcess-dtl.19.mcz Thanks -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx |
El mié, 13-01-2010 a las 11:10 -0600, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez
escribió: > Hi David, > I am creating the Metacello configuration of OSProcess but I don't know > what versions are stable. Should I take the last ones in the > squeaksource repository of OSProcess: > > OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.20.mcz > > or the last released: > > > OSProcess-dtl.36.mcz > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.19.mcz > > Thanks Other question. What version is OSProcess currently, the same version as the monticello package? Or should I mark the metacello configuration as 1.0? So, I have three options for the version: 0.1 as is the first version of the configuration: Gofer new squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '0.1') load. 53 or 36 as is the version of the mcz package: Gofer new squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '53') load. 1.0 if you determine that this can be version 1.0 of OSProcess: Gofer new squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '1.0') load. What do you want? -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx |
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0600, Miguel Enrique Cob? Martinez wrote:
> El mi??, 13-01-2010 a las 11:10 -0600, Miguel Enrique Cob?? Martinez > escribi??: > > Hi David, > > I am creating the Metacello configuration of OSProcess but I don't know > > what versions are stable. Should I take the last ones in the > > squeaksource repository of OSProcess: > > > > OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz > > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.20.mcz Yes, you should use the most recent versions in Monticello on SqueakSource. > > > > or the last released: > > > > > > OSProcess-dtl.36.mcz > > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.19.mcz These are out of date. You can safely use the latest versions. > > Other question. What version is OSProcess currently, the same version as > the monticello package? Or should I mark the metacello configuration as > 1.0? I don't know now Metacello version numbering would work, but OSProcess itself has a version label. Evaluate "OSProcess versionString" to identify the version of OSProcess. If it is possible to use this for the Metacello version strings, that would be best. > > So, I have three options for the version: > > 0.1 as is the first version of the configuration: > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > load. > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '0.1') load. > > 53 or 36 as is the version of the mcz package: > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > load. > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '53') load. > > 1.0 if you determine that this can be version 1.0 of OSProcess: > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > load. > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '1.0') load. > > What do you want? > The current version level of OSProcess (in OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz) is 4.3.11, so if you are identifying a specific version, this is what you should use. Overall I prefer if folks can just use the latest version at any point in time. Back when we had SqueakMap I used to package it up as a SAR file and "release" it every once in a while, but this does not seem to be necessary any more, and it is generally best to just use the latest version. Thanks, Dave |
El mié, 13-01-2010 a las 13:13 -0500, David T. Lewis escribió:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0600, Miguel Enrique Cob? Martinez wrote: > > El mi??, 13-01-2010 a las 11:10 -0600, Miguel Enrique Cob?? Martinez > > escribi??: > > > Hi David, > > > I am creating the Metacello configuration of OSProcess but I don't know > > > what versions are stable. Should I take the last ones in the > > > squeaksource repository of OSProcess: > > > > > > OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz > > > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.20.mcz > > Yes, you should use the most recent versions in Monticello on SqueakSource. Ok. > > > > > > > or the last released: > > > > > > > > > OSProcess-dtl.36.mcz > > > Tests-OSProcess-dtl.19.mcz > > These are out of date. You can safely use the latest versions. > > > > > Other question. What version is OSProcess currently, the same version as > > the monticello package? Or should I mark the metacello configuration as > > 1.0? > > I don't know now Metacello version numbering would work, but OSProcess itself > has a version label. Evaluate "OSProcess versionString" to identify the version > of OSProcess. If it is possible to use this for the Metacello version strings, > that would be best. > > > > > So, I have three options for the version: > > > > 0.1 as is the first version of the configuration: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > > load. > > > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '0.1') load. > > > > 53 or 36 as is the version of the mcz package: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > > load. > > > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '53') load. > > > > 1.0 if you determine that this can be version 1.0 of OSProcess: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > > package: 'ConfigurationOfOSProcess'; > > load. > > > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOSProcess) project version: '1.0') load. > > > > What do you want? > > > > The current version level of OSProcess (in OSProcess-dtl.53.mcz) is 4.3.11, so > if you are identifying a specific version, this is what you should use. > > Overall I prefer if folks can just use the latest version at any point in time. > Back when we had SqueakMap I used to package it up as a SAR file and "release" > it every once in a while, but this does not seem to be necessary any more, and > it is generally best to just use the latest version. > > Thanks, > Dave > > > Ok, I'll use 4.3.11 then, thank you very much. -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |