Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak VM

[OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

3 messages Options

Mariano Martinez Peck

[OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

Co is for co-exist ? and not for cog ?

thanks

mariano

Eliot Miranda-2

Re: [OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

Co is for co-exist ? and not for cog ?

Because it coexists with the JIT. Actually it's a co-dependency relationship; the JIT and it's generated code can't do without the CoInterpreter.

thanks

mariano

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: [OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

Co is for co-exist ? and not for cog ?

Because it coexists with the JIT. Actually it's a co-dependency relationship; the JIT and it's generated code can't do without the CoInterpreter.

Ok...thanks for the clarification

b.
e.

thanks

mariano