Object>>at:modify:???
Locked
 
|
I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it.
What do you think? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message...
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it. -- Hernán Wilkinson
Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: [hidden email] site: http://www.10Pines.com _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Object>>at:modify:???
|
|
On 22.10.2010 23:04, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
> In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... At least we should move it to Dictionary. But I think we can easily fix Kom. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Ok we can deprecate it.
On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:04 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: > In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it. > What do you think? > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > -- > Hernán Wilkinson > Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching > Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 > email: [hidden email] > site: http://www.10Pines.com > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Object>>at:modify:???
|
|
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: Ok we can deprecate it. ys, but please please please use deprecated: anExplanationString on: date in: version cheers mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
Why not deprecate/remove the #deprecate: without the useful parameters? :D
2010/10/23 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
yes we probably should
On Oct 23, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Why not deprecate/remove the #deprecate: without the useful parameters? :D > > 2010/10/23 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ok we can deprecate it. > > > ys, but please please please use deprecated: anExplanationString on: date in: version > > cheers > > mariano > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:04 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: > > > In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it. > > What do you think? > > > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > > > -- > > Hernán Wilkinson > > Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching > > Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 > > email: [hidden email] > > site: http://www.10Pines.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Object>>at:modify:???
|
|
In reply to this post by Guillermo Polito
2010/10/23 Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> Why not deprecate/remove the #deprecate: without the useful parameters? :D I said that few months ago: http://forum.world.st/what-about-deprecating-deprecated-td2306905.html#a2306905 :)
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Object>>at:modify:???
|
|
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall-2-3
On 23.10.2010 14:23, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> On 22.10.2010 23:04, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: >> In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... > > At least we should move it to Dictionary. But I think we can easily fix Kom. It's gone in KomHttpServer-pmm.60 Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Deprecation policy (was: Re: Object>>at:modify:???)
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email] >> wrote: > >> Ok we can deprecate it. >> >> > ys, but please please please use deprecated: anExplanationString on: date > in: version Wouldn't it be easier to rely on method timestamps + a version cache, than spreading redundant information all over the place? Something like: Object >> deprecated: anExplanationString "Warn that the sending method has been deprecated." (Deprecation method: thisContext sender method explanation: anExplanationString on: (TimeStamp fromMethodTimeStamp: thisContext sender method timeStamp) date "Or something nicer") signal Deprecation class >> method: aCompiledMethod explanation: anExplanationString on: date ^self new method: aCompiledMethod explanation: anExplanationString on: date asString in: (SystemVersion alphaVersionAt: date) Someone has to implement #alphaVersionAt: (which is easy, but SystemVersion has to be modified). Finally the developement process has to follow some simple rules. Levente > > cheers > > mariano > > >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:04 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: >> >>> In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, stephane ducasse < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >>> I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it. >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hernán Wilkinson >>> Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching >>> Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 >>> email: [hidden email] >>> site: http://www.10Pines.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Deprecation policy (was: Re: Object>>at:modify:???)
|
|
I think the idea was that the deprecation scheme was fairly simple,
and slightly better than just the original deprecated: . What you describe looks a bit over the top to me. just my 2p... cheers, Mike 2010/10/24 Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]>: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[hidden email] >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> Ok we can deprecate it. >>> >>> >> ys, but please please please use deprecated: anExplanationString on: date >> in: version > > Wouldn't it be easier to rely on method timestamps + a version cache, than > spreading redundant information all over the place? Something like: > > Object >> deprecated: anExplanationString > "Warn that the sending method has been deprecated." > > (Deprecation > method: thisContext sender method > explanation: anExplanationString > on: (TimeStamp fromMethodTimeStamp: thisContext sender method > timeStamp) date "Or something nicer") signal > > Deprecation class >> method: aCompiledMethod explanation: > anExplanationString on: date > > ^self new > method: aCompiledMethod > explanation: anExplanationString > on: date asString > in: (SystemVersion alphaVersionAt: date) > > Someone has to implement #alphaVersionAt: (which is easy, but SystemVersion > has to be modified). > Finally the developement process has to follow some simple rules. > > > Levente > >> >> cheers >> >> mariano >> >> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:04 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: >>> >>>> In a 1.1 image I have, the class HttpRequest is using that message... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, stephane ducasse < >>> >>> [hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would like to deprecate the following method since nobody use it. >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hernán Wilkinson >>>> Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching >>>> Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 >>>> email: [hidden email] >>>> site: http://www.10Pines.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |