Hello,
I wrote a new inspector for Squeak named ObjectFinder. You can install it using Packages Universe Browser, under the category "Development". Please, give me some feedback if you use it.
Fréd
|
> Some info :
> http://decomp.ulb.ac.be/frdricpluquet/personalstuff/theobjectfinder/ I guess you know the inspector that is part of OB-Tools? http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser/ Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch |
Hello Lukas, - you have derived parts (as size for Collection)
- I have fields/methods/... filters to more information on a given node. It seems that the architecture of both is also very close. We can perhaps do a merge of your ideas to do only one tool.
Fréd 2008/1/8, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>: > Some info : -- Frédéric Pluquet Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Assistant http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/fpluquet |
> It seems that the architecture of both is also very close. We can perhaps do
> a merge of your ideas to do only one tool. Yes, that would be cool. Do you also have full support for drag-and-drop? As you can see I've also done a debugger, process browser, file browser, and started with some work on a transcript and a workspace. Except for the process browser none of the tools is in my opinion really useful for primtime yet. I am basically waiting for OB to get more powerful (e.g. to be able to compose browser into each other). Lukas > > Fréd > > 2008/1/8, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>: > > > > Some info : > > > http://decomp.ulb.ac.be/frdricpluquet/personalstuff/theobjectfinder/ > > > > I guess you know the inspector that is part of OB-Tools? > > > > http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser/ > > > > Lukas > > > > -- > > Lukas Renggli > > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > > > > > > > -- > Frédéric Pluquet > Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) > Assistant > http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/fpluquet > > > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch |
No, I don't have. I will take some time to see exactly what are your implemented features and write a "to do list", on which we could work ;-)
As you can see I've also done a debugger, process browser, file I have two questions : - do you develop also the OmniBrowser ? - do you know where can I find some information (web site, pdf, ...) ? The architecture seems to evoluate quickly and I don't find other information source that the code itself...
Lukas -- Frédéric Pluquet Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Assistant http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/fpluquet |
> - do you develop also the OmniBrowser ?
I use OmniBrowser for all my development since the very beginning. I contributed some fixes and enhancements, but I am not actively developing on the core framework. I am responsible for the refactoring tool integration (OB-Refactory) and I play with OB-Tools, as features I am missing from OB get added. > - do you know where can I find some information (web site, pdf, ...) ? The > architecture seems to evoluate quickly and I don't find other information > source that the code itself... The mailing-list: http://mail.wiresong.ca/mailman/listinfo Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch |
In reply to this post by Frederic Pluquet-3
On Jan 8, 2008 7:26 PM, Frederic Pluquet <[hidden email]> wrote:
> - do you know where can I find some information (web site, pdf, ...) ? The > architecture seems to evoluate quickly and I don't find other information > source that the code itself... You also have a reference which has been updated some months ago. http://bergel.eu/download/OmnibrowserReference.pdf -- Damien Cassou |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:18:19 +0100, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> As you can see I've also done a debugger, process browser, file > browser, and started with some work on a transcript and a workspace. > Except for the process browser none of the tools is in my opinion > really useful for primtime yet. I am basically waiting for OB to get > more powerful (e.g. to be able to compose browser into each other). For what it's worth, I've made a bit of progress on that, as part of my MC2 work. Recent versions of the builder classes have a method called #horizontalGroupWith: that allows panels to be arranged from left to right. Between that an #veritcalGroupWith: we can now do fairly complex layout of components. Colin |
> > As you can see I've also done a debugger, process browser, file
> > browser, and started with some work on a transcript and a workspace. > > Except for the process browser none of the tools is in my opinion > > really useful for primtime yet. I am basically waiting for OB to get > > more powerful (e.g. to be able to compose browser into each other). > > For what it's worth, I've made a bit of progress on that, as part of my > MC2 work. Recent versions of the builder classes have a method called > #horizontalGroupWith: that allows panels to be arranged from left to > right. Between that an #veritcalGroupWith: we can now do fairly complex > layout of components. This is great news, I will give it a try at the weekend. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch |
In reply to this post by Colin Putney
"Colin Putney" <[hidden email]> wrote in message
> right. Between that an #veritcalGroupWith: we can now do fairly complex > layout of components. Has the vertical stretching behavior changed? When I stretch the bottom edge down, the upper panels stretch downward too, and I find I am always restoring them. Sophie |
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:32:37 -0600, itsme213 wrote:
> "Colin Putney" <[hidden email]> wrote in message >> right. Between that an #veritcalGroupWith: we can now do fairly complex >> layout of components. > > Has the vertical stretching behavior changed? When I stretch the > bottom edge > down, the upper panels stretch downward too, and I find I am always > restoring them. No, proportional layout of the panels is the desired behavior, so that hasn't changed. Colin |
"Colin Putney" <[hidden email]> wrote in message
> No, proportional layout of the panels is the desired behavior, so that > hasn't changed. You are right. - Sophie |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |