Totally. While I really do believe (note: belief can be a pitfall) that we really *do* need FunSqueak, and badly, I think (and I could be wrong) that we *also* need NotFunSqueak too. For all those serious career folk who have trouble with experiencing fun. If only we could get these people talking to the kids, who will define "fun" for a whole generation.
Uh, and if you want to take my "FunSqueak"-worthy picture and put it in FunSqueak, you can check out ContentPack (which has a way to get graphic data in while preserving a classic update stream,) but make sure you check out the Hannes Hirtzel version, not mine. He's doing cool stuff with it! Anyway that's either in Cuis or going in soon. Should be easy to load for the master of loading systems which are hard to load! And by that, I'm talking about you, E.
Thank you.
Casey
On Friday, February 8, 2013, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
On 2/8/13 4:23 AM, "Casey Ransberger" <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'casey.obrien.r@gmail.com')">casey.obrien.r@...> wrote:
> Do any of the other candidates feature a leopard-skin-pillbox-hat?
>
> It's worth taking some time to consider, especially if you're into Dylan.
If I do not vote on day one, rush on vote you.
For next year, do not vote for any candidate without FunSqueak picture !!!
Edgar
--
Casey Ransberger
Locked
photo.JPG (49K)