Hello Regards — |
> On 18-06-2018, at 8:14 AM, HonshuBloc <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hello > I´m a graphic designer looking for cool open source projects to make a graphic contribution, for free of course :P Well that's very kind of you; there's certainly plenty of scope for better graphic design of many of our tools. And indeed our website might benefit from some tweaking. > δm wondering if you are interested in a new logo for your project. We've been happily using the current one for 22 years now, so probably not. Of course, I'm biased since I designed it. tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Multitasking: Screwing up several things at once... |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
Hi Honshu, > On Jun 18, 2018, at 8:14 AM, HonshuBloc <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hello > I´m a graphic designer looking for cool open source projects to make a graphic contribution, for free of course :P > δm wondering if you are interested in a new logo for your project. > don’t my let Tim put you off. We’d be delighted to have a look at your designs. Perhaps you could go something for the Cog logo for the opensmalltalk vm (used by Squeak and others): http://opensmalltalk.org/ > Regards > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. > Eliot, _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone) — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
On 19 June 2018 at 00:47, OpenSmalltalk-Bot <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > On 18-06-2018, at 8:14 AM, HonshuBloc <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Hello > > I´m a graphic designer looking for cool open source projects to make a > graphic contribution, for free of course :P > Thanks for the offer. > > δm wondering if you are interested in a new logo for your project. > > We've been happily using the current one for 22 years now, so probably > not. Of course, I'm biased since I designed it. > Tim, I guess you referring to the Squeak logo ( http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/files/page17_1.jpg) which is well established. But I don't think we've long had the OpenSmalltalk "Cog" logo ( http://opensmalltalk.org/static/img/cog.png/). While its workable, its but a bit "complicated" for a logo. Now that we have Spur and Sista as technology components that extend Cog, it might be good to base a logo on more generic concepts that distinguish us: 1. message passing between objects 2. object-oriented execution engine Are those reasonable? What other distinctions are important compared to other systems, and how should they be prioritized for a logo? cheers -ben — |
> On 18-06-2018, at 4:15 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Tim, I guess you referring to the Squeak logo ( > http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/files/page17_1.jpg) which is well > established. Indeed! It's everywhere. > But I don't think we've long had the OpenSmalltalk "Cog" logo ( > http://opensmalltalk.org/static/img/cog.png/). > While its workable, its but a bit "complicated" for a logo. This is very true; the small gear teeth details are problematic when small. A new view on that would be nice. Where I think a fresh set of skilled eyes would *really* help is the in-image look. Font choices and menu icons etc. Color sets. tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim When you earnestly believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do |
> On 19.06.2018, at 05:15, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > >> On 18-06-2018, at 4:15 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> Tim, I guess you referring to the Squeak logo ( >> http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/files/page17_1.jpg) which is well >> established. > > Indeed! It's everywhere. > > I would love to have a logo, maybe with The Balloon incorporated, that is a bit more "area"-y and a bit less "stroke"-y >> But I don't think we've long had the OpenSmalltalk "Cog" logo ( >> http://opensmalltalk.org/static/img/cog.png/). >> While its workable, its but a bit "complicated" for a logo. I might have the ai laying around somewhere best -tobias > > This is very true; the small gear teeth details are problematic when small. A new view on that would be nice. > > Where I think a fresh set of skilled eyes would *really* help is the in-image look. Font choices and menu icons etc. Color sets. > > tim > -- > tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim > When you earnestly believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |