I fixed a mistake in the compilation of the SqueakSSL plugin in the minheadless VM for Mac. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/pull/419 Commit Summary
File ChangesPatch Links:
— |
Please explain. — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
On the minheadless VM that is built using cmake, the add_vm_plugin_sources cmake macro requires specifying the the plugin sources explicitly, which is omitting the src/plugins/SqueakSSL/SqueakSSL.c in the compilation of the plugin. By using the other macro (add_vm_plugin_auto), the platform specific files are automatically found with a glob pattern. This is a mistake that I introduced myself. This problem can be reproduced in Pharo using the minheadless vm of this repository on OS X with the following script: ´´´smalltalk CI errors on travis are not related to this PR. — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
Ok, but then I don't understand why Mac needs the explicit — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
In the case of the minheadless VM for OS X, we are treating the VM as it were an unix since we are removing all of the platform specific windowing code in this VM variant. For this reason, in the cases where OS X is different than another unix, the plugin code has to be added manually. — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
In the case of the minheadless VM for OS X, we are treating the VM as it were an unix since we are removing all of the platform specific windowing code in this VM variant. For this reason, in the cases where OS X is different than another unix, the plugin code has to be added manually. — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
Side note: I would've liked to see the explanation to be part of the commit message. It'll be rather hard to find this discussion if we need to in the future. But it's not too late: we can still add the info to the merge commit. — |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
@ronsaldo pushed 1 commit.
— |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
> On 2019-08-22, at 5:07 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Side note: I would've liked to see the explanation to be part of the commit message. It'll be rather hard to find this discussion if we need to in the future. But it's not too late: we can still add the info to the merge commit. Generically we should include actually meaningful comments and explanations to every change, vm or image. But we don't. This makes me sad. tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- Runs squares around the competition. |
In reply to this post by David T Lewis
Merged #419 into Cog. — |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |