OK, I've hacked -270. I need to revert the 4.5 base that I have to a
pre-270 version, which I'll do tomorrow. Hopefully that will fix things. frank On 12 December 2013 21:44, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: > I guess I meant that when we're in such a messed-up alpha state > anyway, there's no harm in simply correcting it in update-fbs.270. > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I have no idea what you mean. Yes, the config map exists, and I know >> very well why the package is in the image. What I _don't_ know is how >> to fix the problem. Bear in mind that the latest config map is 272! >> >> Do I add a postscript to ToolBuilder-Tests that unregisters ToolBuilderTests? >> >> frank >> >> On 12 December 2013 20:42, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> update-fbs.270 >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> No. Updating from the latest alpha image is what I did, and definitely >>>> does have ToolBuilderTests. Look in the manifest of the latest >>>> SqueakTrunk build >>>> (http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/667/console): >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> 2013-12-12T02:46:47.668000014+01:00: ToolBuilderTests (fbs.1) >>>> 2013-12-12T02:46:47.668000015+01:00: Tools (nice.508) >>>> 2013-12-12T02:46:47.668000016+01:00: ToolsTests (fbs.67) >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> frank >>>> >>>> On 12 December 2013 19:48, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Updating from the lastest alpha image, which is how we'll produce release >>>>> image, will never get ToolBuilderTests. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, but that unloading was manual? >>>>>> >>>>>> frank >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12 December 2013 19:16, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> > I have ToolBuilder-Tests after updating from trunk. I unloaded >>>>>> > ToolBuilderTests. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Frank Shearar >>>>>> > <[hidden email]> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Despite the lack of a ToolBuilderTests, and the presence of a >>>>>> >> ToolBuilder-Tests package, Monticello Browser tells me that I have a >>>>>> >> ToolBuilderTests, not a ToolBuilder-Tests. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> frank >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On 11 December 2013 20:56, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> > OK, I think I've done the right thing - mind giving it a check? >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > frank >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > On 11 December 2013 11:20, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >> Thanks, Chris. I've prepped the changes, and I'll push them tonight. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> frank >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> On 11 December 2013 02:19, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2 too, since you have its code in >>>>>> >> >>> the >>>>>> >> >>> new -1. >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Chris Muller >>>>>> >> >>> <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>> Since there is no ancestry yet, you can remove the ancestry and >>>>>> >> >>>> start >>>>>> >> >>>> over: >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> - Delete working copy ToolBuilderTests. >>>>>> >> >>>> - Add ToolBuilderTests back (+Package button). Ancestry is now >>>>>> >> >>>> clean. >>>>>> >> >>>> - Use the rename function from the menu to rename ToolBuilderTests >>>>>> >> >>>> to >>>>>> >> >>>> ToolBuilder-Tests. >>>>>> >> >>>> - Save ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.1. >>>>>> >> >>>> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1 from the repository. >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Frank Shearar >>>>>> >> >>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>> n 10 December 2013 00:21, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> >>>>>> >> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> PS -- Since it was for aesthetic reasons, it would be better >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> and >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> more >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> consistent if it were named "ToolBuilder-Tests" instead of >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> "ToolBuilderTests". >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Sure, but then Monticello forces you to have as many packages >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> as >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> there are >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> ToolBuilder-Foo thingies, right? That's ok for ToolBuilder, >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> but >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> for Tools >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I was talking about ToolBuilder-*, not Tools. The other >>>>>> >> >>>>>> packages >>>>>> >> >>>>>> in >>>>>> >> >>>>>> the family are >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ToolBuilder-Morphic >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ToolBuilder-MVC >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ToolBuilder-SUnit >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Whoa! ALL of which have no definitions! Frank is this >>>>>> >> >>>>>> something >>>>>> >> >>>>>> you >>>>>> >> >>>>>> modularized out? So we should somehow remove these >>>>>> >> >>>>>> WorkingCopy's >>>>>> >> >>>>>> from >>>>>> >> >>>>>> the trunk image. Via some postscript perhaps? >>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>> Nah, I just did the wrong thing. Worse, I even paused to think >>>>>> >> >>>>> about >>>>>> >> >>>>> the package name before doing the wrong thing. The question is: >>>>>> >> >>>>> how >>>>>> >> >>>>> to >>>>>> >> >>>>> rename the package? It's trivial to rename the package through >>>>>> >> >>>>> the >>>>>> >> >>>>> UI. >>>>>> >> >>>>> But now I have a ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2. Is the right thing to do >>>>>> >> >>>>> the >>>>>> >> >>>>> following?: >>>>>> >> >>>>> * rename the mcz to ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.2 >>>>>> >> >>>>> * copy that to trunk >>>>>> >> >>>>> * change the config map to reference this instead of >>>>>> >> >>>>> ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1 >>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>> frank >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> |
In reply to this post by Frank Shearar-3
You got the dash added, but you made the "B" lowercase. Toolbuilder-Tests instead of ToolBuilder-Tests.. :) On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: OK, I think I've done the right thing - mind giving it a check? |
On 13 December 2013 23:09, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> You got the dash added, but you made the "B" lowercase. Toolbuilder-Tests > instead of ToolBuilder-Tests.. :) <insert a long string of expletives here> I'll fix it. frank > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> OK, I think I've done the right thing - mind giving it a check? >> >> frank >> >> On 11 December 2013 11:20, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Thanks, Chris. I've prepped the changes, and I'll push them tonight. >> > >> > frank >> > >> > On 11 December 2013 02:19, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2 too, since you have its code in the >> >> new -1. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Since there is no ancestry yet, you can remove the ancestry and start >> >>> over: >> >>> >> >>> - Delete working copy ToolBuilderTests. >> >>> - Add ToolBuilderTests back (+Package button). Ancestry is now clean. >> >>> - Use the rename function from the menu to rename ToolBuilderTests to >> >>> ToolBuilder-Tests. >> >>> - Save ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.1. >> >>> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1 from the repository. >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Frank Shearar >> >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>>> n 10 December 2013 00:21, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> PS -- Since it was for aesthetic reasons, it would be better and >> >>>>>>> more >> >>>>>>> consistent if it were named "ToolBuilder-Tests" instead of >> >>>>>>> "ToolBuilderTests". >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Sure, but then Monticello forces you to have as many packages as >> >>>>>> there are >> >>>>>> ToolBuilder-Foo thingies, right? That's ok for ToolBuilder, but >> >>>>>> for Tools >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I was talking about ToolBuilder-*, not Tools. The other packages in >> >>>>> the family are >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ToolBuilder-Morphic >> >>>>> ToolBuilder-MVC >> >>>>> ToolBuilder-SUnit >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Whoa! ALL of which have no definitions! Frank is this something >> >>>>> you >> >>>>> modularized out? So we should somehow remove these WorkingCopy's >> >>>>> from >> >>>>> the trunk image. Via some postscript perhaps? >> >>>> >> >>>> Nah, I just did the wrong thing. Worse, I even paused to think about >> >>>> the package name before doing the wrong thing. The question is: how >> >>>> to >> >>>> rename the package? It's trivial to rename the package through the >> >>>> UI. >> >>>> But now I have a ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2. Is the right thing to do the >> >>>> following?: >> >>>> * rename the mcz to ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.2 >> >>>> * copy that to trunk >> >>>> * change the config map to reference this instead of >> >>>> ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1 >> >>>> >> >>>> frank |
> <insert a long string of expletives here> I'll fix it. <pseudo-Facebook mode> Like. :) </pseudo-Facebook mode> -- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume +1 510 984 8117 (Skype rings this until 31 January 2014) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |