Pareto (was Re: [squeak-dev] Release blues?)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Pareto (was Re: [squeak-dev] Release blues?)

Casey Ransberger-2
Comments inline.

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
<snip />
I read a report a while ago (my google-fu is not strong enough to find it though) that it is quite normal in open-source projects to have very few very active contributors and many more less active contributors. That's the Pareto principle at work. So I'm not desperate at all :)
 
It would seem that this rule extends beyond "open source software" all the way to "user generated content." At Snapvine we saw something like the Pareto ratio between producers/heavy users and consumers/casual users of our VOIP content creation system. I would bet money that e.g. YouTube has had a similar experience.

I really wonder about where that number really comes from:)

I am, however, interested in what others perceive to be obstacles to contributing, so thank you very much for starting this survey!

- Bert -





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pareto (was Re: [squeak-dev] Release blues?)

Bert Freudenberg
On 21.04.2010, at 20:21, Casey Ransberger wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> <snip />
>> I read a report a while ago (my google-fu is not strong enough to find it though) that it is quite normal in open-source projects to have very few very active contributors and many more less active contributors. That's the Pareto principle at work. So I'm not desperate at all :)
>  
> It would seem that this rule extends beyond "open source software" all the way to "user generated content." At Snapvine we saw something like the Pareto ratio between producers/heavy users and consumers/casual users of our VOIP content creation system. I would bet money that e.g. YouTube has had a similar experience.
>
> I really wonder about where that number really comes from:)

It's a general principle of self-organized groups. Excellent talk here:

http://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_on_institutions_versus_collaboration.html

(and that might be where I remembered the commit statistics from)

The talk also explains why removing hurdles to contributing is paramount, so that's why this is important:

>> I am, however, interested in what others perceive to be obstacles to contributing, so thank you very much for starting this survey!

- Bert -