Hello Marcel
a question, see below. Regards Hannes On 1/11/19, Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, there. > > I would like to continue serving on the Squeak Oversight Board in 2019, too. > My main interests encompass user interaction (Morphic), > code modularity > (readability/extensibility), What are your suggestions / plans for 5.3 for enhancing the Morphic user interaction expericence? How do you think better readability of code could be achived? > backwards compatibility (Etoys), and > programming/productivity tools. > > During the past years, it has been a healthy mix of promising ideas, > enlightening discussions, and challenging viewpoints. I do value such > programming experiences as a great addition to my daily life. Squeak's > community is great! Thank you. :-) > > Let us continue shaping Squeak for many opportunities to come! It is an > intriguing programming system with its liveness promoting exploratory > working habits. What a time to be a "programmer". ;-) > > Best, > Marcel > Am 10.01.2019 20:38:30 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]>: > Hi All, > > Thank you Craig for jumping right in! I would encourage everyone else to > follow Craig's lead. I know some people like to wait but the more > candidates the better. > > The lack of candidates shouldn't be an incentive for people to run and a > large number of candidates shouldn't be a reason for you to decide against > volunteering to run! We have had some excellent people run and not be > elected that would have been terrific members of the board! You show your > commitment to Squeak just by running! For those of you that say you don't > have the time or are not sure what you would have to do, we have had some > excellent answers in the past. There is no requirement or specific demands > and the board decides when and how it will meet. Most, if not all, meetings > are electronic so the demands on your time are very low! Plus the members > are all terrific people you will enjoy working with! > > Jump on in and add your name to the candidate list! > > Thanks! > > Ron Teitelbaum > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 2:49 AM Craig Latta <[hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]]> wrote: > > > Hi all-- > > I'd like to serve on the Squeak Oversight Board in 2019. With you > and my fellow board members, I intend to continue... > > - ...representing Squeak at conferences, including ESUG and the > International Conference on Live Coding[1]. > > - ...maintaining the agenda and notes at the board meetings. I > anticipate having the time to make posts to the board blog this > term. > > - ...developing symbiosis between the Squeak, JavaScript, and Web > platform communities through my work with Caffeine[2] and > SqueakJS[3]. > > I would be honored to have your vote. > > > cheers! > > Craig > > -- > > [1] http://iclc.livecodenetwork.org/2019/ingles.html > [http://iclc.livecodenetwork.org/2019/ingles.html] > [2] https://caffeine.js.org [https://caffeine.js.org] > [3] https://squeak.js.org [https://squeak.js.org] > > -- > Craig Latta > Black Page Digital > Amsterdam :: San Francisco > [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] > +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) > + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) > > > |
Hi Hannes, I have been taking notes and collecting ideas for the following (unordered / not prioritized / incomplete) list of concerns in Squeak: - Flaps (code clean-up, conceptual improvements) - User-input events (extract from Morphic into base system) - Etoys (code clean-up) - Text widgets (code clean-up, conceptual improvements) - Text/paragraph composition (extract from Morphic into base system) - Tool support for UI-theme design - Tool support for release manager - Smart splitters (performance and configurable animation) - List widgets (drop-down list, multi-selection in any list, multi-column trees, etc.) - Error handling for bad Morphic event handlers (similar to drawing errors) - Object Collection Tool (see inbox "Tool-mt.535" or http://forum.world.st/The-Inbox-Tools-mt-536-mcz-td4808731.html) Best, Marcel
|
Hello Marcel
Below is list of ideas you made early January about possible additions for the Squeak 5.3 release. Quite a number of points have been realized. Could you please mark the one(s) you think which still could be done in the remaining two or three weeks? I will have a look at it as well in the upcoming days. Good to see your focus on Text widgets / Text paragraph composition. Maybe we still can do something about the flaps. @ Tim : what are your preferences? Kind regards Hannes On 1/16/19, Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > I have been taking notes and collecting ideas for the following (unordered / > not prioritized / incomplete) list of concerns in Squeak: > > - Flaps (code clean-up, conceptual improvements) > - User-input events (extract from Morphic into base system) > - Etoys (code clean-up) > - Text widgets (code clean-up, conceptual improvements) > - Text/paragraph composition (extract from Morphic into base system) > - Tool support for UI-theme design > - Tool support for release manager > - Smart splitters (performance and configurable animation) > - List widgets (drop-down list, multi-selection in any list, multi-column > trees, etc.) > - Error handling for bad Morphic event handlers (similar to drawing errors) > - Object Collection Tool (see inbox "Tool-mt.535" > or http://forum.world.st/The-Inbox-Tools-mt-536-mcz-td4808731.html > [http://forum.world.st/The-Inbox-Tools-mt-536-mcz-td4808731.html]) > > Best, > Marcel > Am 14.01.2019 13:57:09 schrieb H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: > Hello Marcel > > a question, see below. > > Regards > Hannes > > On 1/11/19, Marcel Taeumel wrote: >> Hi, there. >> >> I would like to continue serving on the Squeak Oversight Board in 2019, >> too. >> My main interests encompass user interaction (Morphic), >> code modularity >> (readability/extensibility), > > What are your suggestions / plans for 5.3 for enhancing the Morphic > user interaction expericence? > > How do you think better readability of code could be achived? > >> backwards compatibility (Etoys), and >> programming/productivity tools. >> >> During the past years, it has been a healthy mix of promising ideas, >> enlightening discussions, and challenging viewpoints. I do value such >> programming experiences as a great addition to my daily life. Squeak's >> community is great! Thank you. :-) >> >> Let us continue shaping Squeak for many opportunities to come! It is an >> intriguing programming system with its liveness promoting exploratory >> working habits. What a time to be a "programmer". ;-) >> >> Best, >> Marcel >> Am 10.01.2019 20:38:30 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum : >> Hi All, >> >> Thank you Craig for jumping right in! I would encourage everyone else to >> follow Craig's lead. I know some people like to wait but the more >> candidates the better. >> >> The lack of candidates shouldn't be an incentive for people to run and a >> large number of candidates shouldn't be a reason for you to decide >> against >> volunteering to run! We have had some excellent people run and not be >> elected that would have been terrific members of the board! You show your >> commitment to Squeak just by running! For those of you that say you don't >> have the time or are not sure what you would have to do, we have had some >> excellent answers in the past. There is no requirement or specific >> demands >> and the board decides when and how it will meet. Most, if not all, >> meetings >> are electronic so the demands on your time are very low! Plus the members >> are all terrific people you will enjoy working with! >> >> Jump on in and add your name to the candidate list! >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ron Teitelbaum >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 2:49 AM Craig Latta >> [mailto:[hidden email]]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all-- >> >> I'd like to serve on the Squeak Oversight Board in 2019. With you >> and my fellow board members, I intend to continue... >> >> - ...representing Squeak at conferences, including ESUG and the >> International Conference on Live Coding[1]. >> >> - ...maintaining the agenda and notes at the board meetings. I >> anticipate having the time to make posts to the board blog this >> term. >> >> - ...developing symbiosis between the Squeak, JavaScript, and Web >> platform communities through my work with Caffeine[2] and >> SqueakJS[3]. >> >> I would be honored to have your vote. >> >> >> cheers! >> >> Craig >> >> -- >> >> [1] http://iclc.livecodenetwork.org/2019/ingles.html >> [http://iclc.livecodenetwork.org/2019/ingles.html] >> [2] https://caffeine.js.org [https://caffeine.js.org] >> [3] https://squeak.js.org [https://squeak.js.org] >> >> -- >> Craig Latta >> Black Page Digital >> Amsterdam :: San Francisco >> [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] >> +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) >> + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) >> >> >> > |
Hi Hannes, those are all quite big challenges. Every single one of them might take me 1-2 weeks full time, which I do not have at the moment. ;-) Yes, existing bugs in Flaps should be fixed -- but not re-designed as I proposed -- during the next weeks. That should be doable. Best, Marcel
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |