At 01:54 PM 5/14/2007, Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 12:32 -0400, Alan Knight wrote: It could be. It was introduced in the 0.3.143 version, which is fairly old, but I think the Squeak port is fairly dated at this point. Todd Blanchard has almost finished an updated port, but then got busy, so he hasn't finished it yet. --
Alan Knight [|], Cincom Smalltalk Development
"The Static Typing Philosophy: Make it fast. Make it right.
Make it run." - Niall Ross
|
In reply to this post by Ramiro Diaz Trepat
Personally, I just use EncodedKom39 or something like that.
>From: "Ramiro Diaz Trepat" <[hidden email]> >Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers >list<[hidden email]> >To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers >list"<[hidden email]> >Subject: Re: Postgres / Glorp >Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:43:40 -0300 > >Sorry Philippe, I am not sure what you mean. > >When you say "a custom Kom" I suppose you mean extensions like >Norbert's. But then, when you say "or get WideStrings". What do you >mean? from where? > >What happened between 3.8 and 3.9? >Why does Kom not work with utf8 in 3.9? >There are plenty of Spanish, German, Swedish and French speakers in >this list, what do you guys use in production? >I suppose that Norbert's solution of adding hooks to translate strings >everytime fixes the problem, but it also introduces a major >performance penalty, because every string that comes and goes has to >get translated (everytime, unless you cache the translations you >make), and I guess these translations are not that cheap. > > > >On 5/14/07, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: >>No, you can either use a custom Kom or get WideStrings. >> >>2007/5/14, Ramiro Diaz Trepat <[hidden email]>: >> > Wow... >> > So I assume that mostly everyone not in an English speaking country >> > with a Seaside application in production is using Squeak 3.8? >> > Is that correct? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 5/14/07, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > 2007/5/14, Ramiro Diaz Trepat <[hidden email]>: >> > > > Indeed, probably another great thing it would be if I could >>configure >> > > > Seaside to directly send me utf8 strings from the input taken on a >> > > > form´s entry fields. >> > > > Is it possible? >> > > >> > > Yes, this is what WAKom is doing. Just remember that you also have to >> > > send utf8 strings to Seaside. Unfortunately WAKom does not work on >> > > Squeak 3.9. >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > Philippe >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On 5/13/07, Ramiro Diaz Trepat <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > > Hello Todd and Marcelo, >> > > > > I am using Squeak 3.9. >> > > > > I know about how to set the encoding on postgres. Indeed, >>utf8 is >> > > > > the encoding I need on the database. >> > > > > What I want to know is if there is any place on the Postgres, >>Glorp >> > > > > or MagritteGlorp packages where I could configure for the strings >>to >> > > > > be translated to Squeak´s default (I think it´s iso). >> > > > > If I have, for example a Person on Glorp, and I want to set a >>last >> > > > > name like mine DÃaz (with an accented vowel), coming from a >>Magritte >> > > > > form for instance, on the setter I translate it to UTF8 >>(#isoToUtf8) >> > > > > before I assign it to my class i.var. And it gets stored on the >> > > > > database with no errors. Later on, when Glorp "hydrates" my >>instance, >> > > > > of course it brings a weird string like "DÃâaz", instead of >>"DÃaz". >> > > > > Of course I would love that conversion to happen automatically >>with >> > > > > a little configuration. >> > > > > Otherwise, what are you guys doing? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 5/13/07, marcelo Cortez <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > > > Ramiro >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm postgres user , i hope help you , postgres >> > > > > > encondig can be configurated at database creation, >> > > > > > postgres client can configurated using statements >> > > > > > SET CLIENT_ENCODING TO 'value'; >> > > > > > take a look at >> > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/multibyte.html >> > > > > > best regards >> > > > > > mdc >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > --- Ramiro Diaz Trepat <[hidden email]> escribió: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Well... sorry for building this thread by myself. >> > > > > > > The issue now is that conversion does not happen >> > > > > > > automatically. I can >> > > > > > > properly store a string on a UTF8 database, by >> > > > > > > previously converting >> > > > > > > it using #isoToUtf8. >> > > > > > > But when strings come back after a query (using >> > > > > > > Glorp), they are not >> > > > > > > converted to iso, and hence they show all screwed >> > > > > > > up. >> > > > > > > Is there any place in Glorp or the Postgres driver >> > > > > > > to configure the >> > > > > > > encoding of the underlying database for these >> > > > > > > conversions to happen >> > > > > > > automatically? >> > > > > > > Thanks ! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > r. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 5/13/07, Ramiro Diaz Trepat <[hidden email]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > Sorry, it does work. >> > > > > > > > I don´t know what happend. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On 5/13/07, Ramiro Diaz Trepat >> > > > > > > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > I was unable to use databases with UTF8 >> > > > > > > encoding, only SQL_ASCII >> > > > > > > > > encoding worked for me. >> > > > > > > > > is it something trivial to configure that I did >> > > > > > > not see or is it a limitation? >> > > > > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > r. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > __________________________________________________ >> > > > > > Preguntá. Respondé. DescubrÃ. >> > > > > > Todo lo que querÃas saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, >> > > > > > está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). >> > > > > > ¡Probalo ya! >> > > > > > http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |