From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Henrik Høyer
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2010 22:04
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; ESUG Mailing list
Subject: Re: [Esug-list] Is Cincom slowly killing Visual Smalltalk
Enterprice
Dear all
From the reactions to my post, I
fear that people might have misunderstood me. Bear in mind, that I am not a
native English speaker – though my language might sound harsh and offensive, I
do have the best intensions.
The subject of the original post
should perhaps have been: “Is Cincom slowly killing Visual Smalltalk Enterprise
*customers*”. Who shot VSE a long time ago is another discussion. As are the
discussion of how/whether one could/should port the applications to other Smalltalk
dialects.
My focus is entirely on how the
current VSE users can extend the life of their applications on the VSE
platform. Even though development on VSE stopped more than 10 years ago, the
applications are still running today on current operating system versions and
with on-par performance.
Part of VSE is closed source;
The VM, the compiler and several other stuff. Though clever hacking/patching
bugs in these closed parts of VSE have been fixes by the community since the
official development stopped. But Cincom (who has the exclusive rights to make
money from supporting the product) has now unleashed its lawyers, and are
threatening some of the most active people in the community. The amount of
“lawyer muscle” behind the threats are actually keeping people from even
replying to this post.
I did have a deep respect for
Cincom; they have done a great job for the Smalltalk community. I don’t know
where in their organization the “money matters more than ethics” policy is in
action. It is not among the Smalltalk people we all know, but the ones who are
pulling the strings are in fact doing a lot of damage to their corporate image.
I know that some Cincom
employees have commented on my post, but I still have had no answers to the
main question:
Are Cincom willing to
donate/sell their “exclusive exploratory rights to the VSE product”?
Please note: The question is not
about the IP. It is only about the rights that Cincom holds, oh and by the way;
are Cincom willing to disclose the contact they have with Seagull regarding
these rights?
With all the best intensions