RV: [Squeak 0002271]: [BUG] [FIX] Changing system font in 3.9

> Ves de lo que hablo Francisco ?
> Y ahora que lo descubra otro estúpido, que lo arregle, que se tome el
> trabajo de hacer todos los tramites burocráticos, etc.
> Y que no se encuentre con un "puente roto" en el medio, como me paso con el
> Morphic Team, donde "el boss" me ha bloqueado los mensajes a la lista.
>
> Lastima que el jefe no es mas Cees, uno de los pocos buenos que quedan en
> "el comité"
>
> Por lo menos este no tardo dos años
>
>
>
> ------ Mensaje reenviado
> De: <[hidden email]>
> Fecha: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:02:30 +0100
> Para: <[hidden email]>
> Asunto: [Squeak 0002271]: [BUG] [FIX] Changing system font in 3.9
>
>
> The following issue has been RESOLVED.
> ======================================================================
> http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2271
> ======================================================================
> Reported By:                edgardec
> Assigned To:                cdegroot
> ======================================================================
> Project:                    Squeak
> Issue ID:                   2271
> Category:                   Morphic
> Reproducibility:            always
> Severity:                   minor
> Priority:                   normal
> Status:                     resolved
> Resolution:                 fixed
> Fixed in Version:           3.9
> ======================================================================
> Date Submitted:             11-28-2005 15:08 CET
> Last Modified:              01-14-2006 00:02 CET
> ======================================================================
> Summary:                    [BUG] [FIX] Changing system font in 3.9
> Description:
> I refile the missing methods, as Paul confirmed what this fix solve the
> problem
> ======================================================================
> Relationships       ID      Summary
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> has duplicate       0002272 [BUG]SyntaxErrorNotification class(Obje...
> ======================================================================
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  KenCausey - 11-29-05 00:29
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Good job Edgar, this does indeed appear to fix the problem.  It does this
> by adding 2 simple missing methods.  However I wonder if maybe this
> shouldn't have been fixed by instead changing the reference.  Especially
> if there is only one place referencing this.
>
> In the future please always gzip (compress) your .cs files before
> uploading them.  Unfortunately the .cs extension is also used by C# and on
> some platforms I fear that the line ending format may be changed if it
> decides to treat these as ASCII text files.
>
> Note this also resolves http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2272 which is the
> same
> issue.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  KenCausey - 11-29-05 00:52
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> OK, I'm not so certain that this is a good fix after I examine it more
> closely.
>
> First of all the instance method #setClass:code:debugger:doitFlag: added
> here refers to a non-existence instance variable called #debugger and does
> not update the definition to add it.
>
> It looks like this has been refactored to use ToolSet to pick the debugger
> rather than it be specified.  This let's it be switched out much more
> easily.
>
> I'll attach my own suggested fix for this in a few minutes.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  KenCausey - 11-29-05 01:12
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please note that ParserAtInReferenceFix-klc.1.cs.gz is my preferred fix
> over the previous SyntaxErrormissingMethods.1.cs.  The problem was a
> missed ToolSet related update.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  cdegroot - 12-08-05 19:42
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Harvested to inbox
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  KenCausey - 12-08-05 20:18
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Speaking of process... ;)
>
> I would really like to keep seperate track of when a team accepts a fix
> and submits it to the release team and then when the fix is actually
> included in a released public update and/or image.  To that goal I think
> it would be best if this issue had not been closed at this stage but
> instead marked 'resolved'.  Of course that requires someone to come back
> and mark the issue closed when it is truly and finally harvested.
>
> This may sound like a pain in the ass but I think it's important.  Fixes
> have been accepted in the past and then dropped and not appear in an
> image.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  ducasse - 01-14-06 00:02
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> in 6709 :)
> script 20
> Compiler-sd.24
>
> Stef
>
> Issue History
> Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change
> ======================================================================
> 11-28-05 15:08  edgardec       New Issue
> 11-28-05 15:08  edgardec       File Added: SyntaxErrormissingMethods.1.cs
>
> 11-28-05 20:33  KenCausey      Relationship added       has duplicate
> 0002272
> 11-29-05 00:29  KenCausey      Note Added: 0003153
> 11-29-05 00:52  KenCausey      Note Added: 0003155
> 11-29-05 01:11  KenCausey      File Added:
> ParserAtInReferenceFix-klc.1.cs.gz
>
> 11-29-05 01:12  KenCausey      Note Added: 0003156
> 11-29-05 23:40  KenCausey      Status                   new => assigned
> 11-29-05 23:40  KenCausey      Assigned To               => cdegroot
> 12-08-05 19:42  cdegroot       Status                   assigned => closed
> 12-08-05 19:42  cdegroot       Note Added: 0003230
> 12-08-05 19:42  cdegroot       Resolution               open => fixed
> 12-08-05 19:42  cdegroot       Fixed in Version          => 3.9
> 12-08-05 20:18  KenCausey      Note Added: 0003232
> 01-14-06 00:02  ducasse        Status                   closed => resolved
> 01-14-06 00:02  ducasse        Note Added: 0003484
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ------ Fin del mensaje reenviado
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
> Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
> http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
>
>
>
>
> correo electrónico a: [hidden email]
>
>
> correo electrónico a: [hidden email]
>
>
> Enlaces de Yahoo! Grupos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Ves de lo que hablo Francisco ?
> Y ahora que lo descubra otro estúpido, que lo arregle, que se tome el
> trabajo de hacer todos los tramites burocráticos, etc.
> Y que no se encuentre con un "puente roto" en el medio, como me paso
> con el
> Morphic Team, donde "el boss" me ha bloqueado los mensajes a la lista.
>
> Lastima que el jefe no es mas Cees, uno de los pocos buenos que quedan
> en
> "el comité"
>
> Por lo menos este no tardo dos años

> Hola Edgar:
>
> Sólo por curiosidad, quién y porqué te bloqueó?
>
> Por otro lado y lamentablemente, creo que el Squeak va de mal en peor
> con los "administradores" actuales.
>
> Ejemplos hay miles, pero uno de los más significativos es el del SM
> que no anda más en muchas imágenes 3.7 por ejemplo, tampoco funcionan
> los upgrades de la 3.9, sino que hay que bajar imágenes ya hechas, en
> fin, un DESASTRE si uno quiere trabajar en serio.
>
> Finalmente, no se si tenemos alguna versión "estable" :S Ahh, si,
> algunas 3.8 funcionan, bien, veremos cuánto tiempo les toma romperlas
> también........
>
> Saludos.

> Si, ya veo...
> Siempre es lamentable ver que ocurran estas cosas, sobre todo en ámbitos
> tecnológicos y científicos, donde debería primar la colaboración y el
> esfuerzo mancomunado en pos del desarrollo de la ideas. Sin embargo,
> siempre salen a relucir los burócratas de la ciencia, los que ponen
> trabas y que como decía Serrat "resulta bochornoso verlos fanfarronear,
> a ver quien la tiene mas grande..."
>
> No te calientes, dale para adelante y aguante SqueakRos !!!!
>
> Saludos,
>
> Francisco