RV: [squeak-dev] [Q] About updating Squeak and some troubles

> De: Ralph Johnson <[hidden email]>
> Fecha: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:46:30 -0500
> Para: <[hidden email]>
> Asunto: Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] About updating Squeak and some troubles
>
>> #Squeak3.9.1
>> 7068advance391a.cs
>> 7069FixingDirtyMultilangual.cs
>> 7070UnloadingOB.cs
>> 7071FreeFixes.cs
>> 7072SemaphoreFixes.cs
>> 7073DelayFixes.cs
>> 7074FixOrderOfRegisteringStartUpList.cs
>> 7075FixingRefToImageBrowser.cs
>> #Squeak3.9.2
>> 7068AdvanceToThreeDotTenAlpha.cs
>> #Squeak3.10alpha
>> 7069ConvertTo3dot10.cs
>>
>> Seems odd to me having 3.8, 3.8.1. 3.8.2 and 3.9, 3.9.1, 3.9.2 and  3.10 ,
>> 3.10.1 etc
>
> Squeak3.10alpha is actually based on Squeak3.9, right?
>
> The problem is that the update stream assumes that the versions for a
> sequence, but they actually form a tree.
>
> It is OK for people to make a new branch, but then they need to make a
> whole new update stream.  So, the updates for 3.9.1 and 3.9.2
> shouldn't be in that file.
>
> -Ralph