Re: [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL

> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>
>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>
>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code
>> and made accessible.
>
> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't
> immediately explode. The code in question downloads
> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>
> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl
> to github as well, right?
>
> Ron?

>
> On 05.04.2015, at 11:54, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>>
>>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>>
>>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code
>>> and made accessible.
>>
>> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't
>> immediately explode. The code in question downloads
>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>>
>> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl
>> to github as well, right?
>>
>> Ron?
>
> please do

>
> On 05.04.2015, at 11:54, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>>
>>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>>
>>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code and
>>> made accessible.
>>
>> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't
>> immediately explode. The code in question downloads
>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>>
>> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl
>> to github as well, right?
>>
>> Ron?
>
> please do

> Sorry I missed your conversation.
>
> I'm porting squeakssl over to github now.  I'll let you know when it is done.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
> Head Of Engineering
> 3d Immersive Collaboration Consulting
> [hidden email]
> Follow Me On Twitter: @RonTeitelbaum
> www.3dicc.com
> https://www.google.com/+3dicc
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Shearar [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:40 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; Ron Teitelbaum
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL
>
> On 5 April 2015 at 19:37, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On 05.04.2015, at 11:54, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>>>
>>>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>>>
>>>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code and
>>>> made accessible.
>>>
>>> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't
>>> immediately explode. The code in question downloads
>>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>>>
>>> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl
>>> to github as well, right?
>>>
>>> Ron?
>>
>> please do
>
> I only feel comfortable about doing this with Ron's feedback - Ron?
>
> frank
>