Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak VM

Re: FFI Testing -- Moby Confused..

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

3 messages Options

KenDickey

Re: FFI Testing -- Moby Confused..

Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:

both success machines had gcc 6.3.0

failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1

Perhaps a code generation change?

-KenD

Eliot Miranda-2

Re: FFI Testing -- Moby Confused..

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:48 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:

both success machines had gcc 6.3.0

failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1

Perhaps a code generation change?

So compile the test functions to assembler with the two different co pilers and do a diff. Or compile dummy functions containing calls to the failing tests and do a diff.

I'm sorry; I don't have a 64-bit ARM machine set up yet. As soon as I do i'll pitch in.

_,,,^..^,,,_

best, Eliot

Nicolas Cellier

Re: FFI Testing -- Moby Confused..

You can also try clang if there is one available...

Le mar. 12 févr. 2019 à 23:55, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> a écrit :

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:48 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:

both success machines had gcc 6.3.0

failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1

Perhaps a code generation change?

So compile the test functions to assembler with the two different co pilers and do a diff. Or compile dummy functions containing calls to the failing tests and do a diff.

I'm sorry; I don't have a 64-bit ARM machine set up yet. As soon as I do i'll pitch in.

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot