Ok...Done. I put you as Юрий Мироненко as mentor (BTW, which is your name with this alphabet ?) and Diógenes Moreira as co-mentor.
Which difficult we should put ? beginner, intermediate or advanced ? Thanks Mariano 2010/3/12 Юрий Мироненко <[hidden email]> Glorp and Magritte both map between model-layer objects and other domains; in Glorp's case, the relational database, in Magritte's case, the web. The truth is that Magritte is a meta-description framework for all kind of descriptions. However, it is mostly used for web applications. |
2010/3/12 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:
> BTW, which is your name with this alphabet ? I guess it is "Yuriy Mironenko". |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
I'd say 'advanced'.
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Ok...Done. I put you as Юрий Мироненко as mentor (BTW, which is your > name with this alphabet ?) and Diógenes Moreira as co-mentor. > > Which difficult we should put ? beginner, intermediate or advanced ? > > Thanks > > Mariano > > 2010/3/12 Юрий Мироненко <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> > > Glorp and Magritte both map between model-layer objects and other > domains; in Glorp's case, the relational database, in Magritte's > case, the web. The truth is that Magritte is a meta-description > framework for all kind of descriptions. However, it is mostly used > for web applications. > > There are many similarities in how each framework manage > model-layer class - accessing model's fields, mapping those fields > to it's representation, caching/commiting/rollbacking, condition > checking/validation and so on. Lot of business applications are > RDS-based, CRUD-like systems, with GUI structure close to model > structure, and model structure close to database structure. So, > developers sometimes feel they are repeating themselves when they > code first the Glorp descriptors and then the Magritte > descriptors, or vice versa. > > The goals of this project are: > Detect common aspects of both frameworks > Compare implementation of those common aspects in both > frameworks, and choose/compile "best" one > Detect any limitations of one framework revealed by comparison > with the other > Refactor the stuff, splitting it to three groups: "common > metamodeling", "Generic ORM" and "GLORP-related" > Cleanup GLORP from "common metamodeling" and "Generic ORM" stuff. > > The output is both a refactored codeset with three level of > abstractness, and an analysis of why functionality was splitted in > this exactly way. > > Technical Details > =========== > Glorp and Magritte have good test suites. XP development to ensure > existing facilities remain functional will protect the student > from breaking some facilities as they experiment with > refactorings. Maintaining, where possible, deprecated methods that > call new API in terms of old API may be appropriate in the > project, and may also assist introduction of the results to the > community. > > There are at least two projects to observe, one is for > magritte-based SQL mapping without GLORP, another one - generator > of simple GLORP mappings with Magritte descriptors. > > Maybe it will be necessary to make some tools for describing > domain-specific Magritte things. For example, something like "with > this domain-specific descriptor you should use this > domain-specific memento for caching". > > Benefits to the Student > =============== > Glorp and Magritte are two meta-modelling/mapping frameworks with > impressive capabilities solving real problems: the student who > does this project will acquire significant practical knowledge of > this kind of meta-modelling. Glorp and Magritte are also important > parts of one way of writing web applications: the student who does > this project will have skills that can be turned to practical > account in web development. > > Benefits to the Community > =============== > Decreasing complexity and entry level for projects with both > Magritte and GLORP inside (a lot of enduser applications really). > Increasing quality of both Magritte and GLORP. Decreasing > complexity of GLORP, which is very complex now becouse of all the > stuff for meta-describing inside. > And avoiding double-efforts in future, so when we'll upgrade > Magritte, we'll upgrade GLORP simultaneously. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Esug-list mailing list >[hidden email] >http://lists.esug.org/listinfo/esug-list > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |