Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for MathMorphs-Revival communications?

>A question about Morphic lists below:
>
> On 2006 May 29 11:53, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> Le 29 mai 06 à 18:02, Milan Zimmermann a écrit :
>> > On 2006 May 29 03:35, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Hum, yes a bit confuse ... maybe we could ask on the squeak-dev list
>> why there is two lists ?
>
> Ok, let me ask: There seem to be 2 Morphic lists: One linked from the
> Teams
> site http://squeak.org/Community/Teams/ as Morphic Stewards:
>
> http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-browse?list=morphic-splitters
>
> and another one that I cannot find on squeak.org
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>
> For the MathMorphs Revival effort, I suggested creating a list, then Serge
> sugested we could ask the morphic list to carry the MathMorph Revival
> communication there - which caused my confusion as to what list (because I
> did not find the "morphic" list above on squeak.org).
>
> So maybe the squeak-dev is the right forum for this question (s):
>
> - Is it general knowledge there are 2 morphic lists, and is it a good idea
> to
> have 2
> - Is it ok to use one of them for the MathMorphs revival communication, or
> better to ask to create a new list for MathMorphs revival?
>
> Regarding the second question, we could keep communicating via private
> email,
> but that makes harder for others to join, and it seems it is good to have
> a
> public record of the changes and discussions.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions, Milan
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/348 - Release Date: 5/25/2006
>
>

> Hi Milan,
>
> I kind of leaded both groups. The Morphic-Splitters group became the
> official Morphic Stewards. So the Morphic-Splitters list is obsolete. I
> don't know if it should be killed, or be left for archival purposes...
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Milan Zimmermann" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>;
> <[hidden email]>; "Lic.Edgar J.De Cleene"
> <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for
> MathMorphs-Revivalcommunications?
>
> >A question about Morphic lists below:
> >
> > On 2006 May 29 11:53, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> >> Le 29 mai 06 à 18:02, Milan Zimmermann a écrit :
> >> > On 2006 May 29 03:35, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Hum, yes a bit confuse ... maybe we could ask on the squeak-dev list
> >> why there is two lists ?
> >
> > Ok, let me ask: There seem to be 2 Morphic lists: One linked from the
> > Teams
> > site http://squeak.org/Community/Teams/ as Morphic Stewards:
> >
> > http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-browse?list=morphic-spl
> >itters
> >
> > and another one that I cannot find on squeak.org
> >
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
> >
> > For the MathMorphs Revival effort, I suggested creating a list, then
> > Serge sugested we could ask the morphic list to carry the MathMorph
> > Revival communication there - which caused my confusion as to what list
> > (because I did not find the "morphic" list above on squeak.org).
> >
> > So maybe the squeak-dev is the right forum for this question (s):
> >
> > - Is it general knowledge there are 2 morphic lists, and is it a good
> > idea to
> > have 2
> > - Is it ok to use one of them for the MathMorphs revival communication,
> > or better to ask to create a new list for MathMorphs revival?
> >
> > Regarding the second question, we could keep communicating via private
> > email,
> > but that makes harder for others to join, and it seems it is good to have
> > a
> > public record of the changes and discussions.
> >
> > Thanks for any suggestions, Milan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/348 - Release Date: 5/25/2006

> Hi Juan,
>
> thanks for commenting. I now think we probably use the original math
> morphs
> list (not on squeak.org) to communicate as there are likely still other
> interested people subscribed there. But if that turns out not possible,
> let
> us leave morphic-splitters in existence for now if that's ok.
>
> Milan
> On 2006 May 31 11:36, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>> Hi Milan,
>>
>> I kind of leaded both groups. The Morphic-Splitters group became the
>> official Morphic Stewards. So the Morphic-Splitters list is obsolete. I
>> don't know if it should be killed, or be left for archival purposes...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Juan Vuletich
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Milan Zimmermann" <[hidden email]>
>> To: "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>;
>> <[hidden email]>; "Lic.Edgar J.De Cleene"
>> <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for
>> MathMorphs-Revivalcommunications?
>>
>> >A question about Morphic lists below:
>> >
>> > On 2006 May 29 11:53, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> >> Le 29 mai 06 à 18:02, Milan Zimmermann a écrit :
>> >> > On 2006 May 29 03:35, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >> Hum, yes a bit confuse ... maybe we could ask on the squeak-dev list
>> >> why there is two lists ?
>> >
>> > Ok, let me ask: There seem to be 2 Morphic lists: One linked from the
>> > Teams
>> > site http://squeak.org/Community/Teams/ as Morphic Stewards:
>> >
>> > http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-browse?list=morphic-spl
>> >itters
>> >
>> > and another one that I cannot find on squeak.org
>> >
>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>> >
>> > For the MathMorphs Revival effort, I suggested creating a list, then
>> > Serge sugested we could ask the morphic list to carry the MathMorph
>> > Revival communication there - which caused my confusion as to what list
>> > (because I did not find the "morphic" list above on squeak.org).
>> >
>> > So maybe the squeak-dev is the right forum for this question (s):
>> >
>> > - Is it general knowledge there are 2 morphic lists, and is it a good
>> > idea to
>> > have 2
>> > - Is it ok to use one of them for the MathMorphs revival communication,
>> > or better to ask to create a new list for MathMorphs revival?
>> >
>> > Regarding the second question, we could keep communicating via private
>> > email,
>> > but that makes harder for others to join, and it seems it is good to
>> > have
>> > a
>> > public record of the changes and discussions.
>> >
>> > Thanks for any suggestions, Milan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/348 - Release Date:
>> > 5/25/2006
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.0/352 - Release Date: 5/30/2006
>
>