Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

>Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I will
>add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to
>ConfigurationOfHelpSystem

No, please just add the package I've mentioned since the ConfigurationOfHelpSystem was before the integration into
Squeak/Pharo and would load old code.

Meanwhile we had adaptions (we dont have the Squeak
support code in Pharo for instance and vice versa).

Maybe we should remove ConfigurationOfHelpSystem since
it now adds more confusion.

>It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For
>example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository.
>But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository.

The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would
expect them to be in the same repo as the code.
I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code
it will be easier to know and maintain it.

Thx
T.



--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Mariano,

I'm not sure I am following ... What Help package are you referring to?

Dale
________________________________________
From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:36 AM
To: Pharo Development; [hidden email]
Subject: [Metacello] Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN]    Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I will
>add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to
>ConfigurationOfHelpSystem

>It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For
>example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository.
>But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository.

The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would
expect them to be in the same repo as the code.
I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code
it will be easier to know and maintain it.


100% agree.

Dale, do you think it is worth to take the Help package from HelpSystem repository and put it in Metacello repo ?

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

You are right ... I didn't know about it ...

So the next question is....I can certainly host it in the primary metacello repository...should I add it to my metacello configuraiton as well, so it can be loaded? If so then I can certainly do that ...

does the package have any dependencies that I need to be aware of?

Dale
________________________________________
From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [[hidden email]]

Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:08 PM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Metacello] Re: [BetaTesting] [ANN]        Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

Hi Dale. Repository: http://www.squeaksource.com/HelpSystem
package: Metacello-Help

maybe you were not even aware of such package (me neither) hahah

cheers

mariano

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
Mariano,

I'm not sure I am following ... What Help package are you referring to?

Dale
________________________________________

From: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]> [[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>]

Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:36 AM

To: Pharo Development; [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

Subject: [Metacello] Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN]    Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]><mailto:[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I will
>add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to
>ConfigurationOfHelpSystem


>It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For
>example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository.
>But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository.

The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would
expect them to be in the same repo as the code.
I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code
it will be easier to know and maintain it.


100% agree.

Dale, do you think it is worth to take the Help package from HelpSystem repository and put it in Metacello repo ?


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list

[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project