Forwarding my marketing... ^,^ k, r On 3/13/20 1:11 PM, Robert wrote:
-- Kindly, Robert |
Hi Matthew,
I apologize for misusing the ietf mailing list for my announcement and attempted marketing of the newly ported to Squeak 5.3, ProCrypto 1.1.1. I hoped to generate some interest and I thought the experience and knowledge of the folks on the ietf list were a welcome (susceptible?) audience for that. Still hoping for a wave of interest in Squeak to proceed. I will always hold onto my hope, in faith. I had posted some time ago with my proposal for v3.7 protocol of ParrotTalk. Here is the IETF document i generated: https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0q0bzm00h3sa00/draft-withers-parrot-talk-v36-v37-01.pdf?dl=0. It is based on the v3.7 ParrotTalk protocol as specified here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jnmp2edkfdpn0wh/ParrotTalkFrameDesign-3.7.pdf?dl=0 ProCrypto 1.1.1 underlies ParrotTalk and used to build encrypted end to end communications. ParrotTalk in particular is designed in a LEGO like toolkit, for educational purposes in building your own protocols. I am porting my implementation of SSL onto the ThunkStack framework upon which rests ParrotTalk. Following that there is SSH to port. And getting Raven to work in the Galaxy Object Scenario: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5rxwno7heimimx2/The%20GalaxyObject%20scenario%20repaired.pdf?dl=0 Sorry to bother, I will be sure to run by the chair in the future. Thank you for the understanding email. Kindly, Robert On 3/16/20 9:45 PM, Sergeant-at-Arms wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I am writing to you on behalf of the sergeant-at-arms (SAA) team for > [hidden email]. This message has been vetted with others on the SAA team, > which is described in more detail at [1]. > > We are reaching out to you because of your recent message to > [hidden email] [2]. The message includes unsolicited email as per [3]. > Please try to avoid sending these messages on [hidden email] in the > future. You can reach the IETF chair at [hidden email] to seek approval > before sending. > > We consider this an initial suggestion. We do not believe your message > is part of a pattern of abuse that would warrant the restriction of your > posting rights. If a pattern emerges, we will consider temporarily > restricting your posting rights to [hidden email]. > > Thanks, > Matthew Miller > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/V-ixHVo-uP67ine0TXZn5kawuxc/ > [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3005 -- Kindly, Robert |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |