Re: {Spam?} Re: Maximizing and Restoring Windows with doubleClick: event

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: {Spam?} Re: Maximizing and Restoring Windows with doubleClick: event

Schwab,Wilhelm K
Agreed all around, and especially with "people can more easily adjust to
new looks than to new interface behaviors.
Squeak should recognize this observation and provide users with their
expected behaviors where possible."

Bill



Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254

Email: [hidden email]
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029

>>> [hidden email] 10/14/07 3:22 PM >>>
Gary Chambers schrieb:
> After incorporating the "double-click-title-bar" thing I was wondering
if
> these kind of events/actions should be themed too...
>
> Easy enough to do (think, a particular theme might "shade" the window
> instead, or minimize, or whatever.
>
> In generally it would mean that the feel could be themed along with
the
> look. Does anyone think that the "feel" part should be broken out for
a
> mix-and-match approach, or would that be too confusing?
It should definitely be broken out. That would allow us to have feels
which are consistent with user's expectations on their native platforms,
while still being able to switch between different looks. For example,
standard keyboard binding conventions vary between the Windows world
(where ctrl- is often used) and the Mac world (where the default command
key is the apple or clover key which maps to the Alt key on PC
keyboards).
With every major release of their operating systems Microsoft and Apple
do essentially the same: Looks may be changed radically or subtly, but
feel is much more stable and evolves in smaller steps. Apparently people
can more easily adjust to new looks than to new interface behaviors.
Squeak should recognize this observation and provide users with their
expected behaviors where possible.

Other possible feel-dependent behaviors could be:
- text and list selection (Windows vs Rest-of-World)
- mouse button bindings (including the paste via middle mouse button
found in X)
- pop-up menu behavior (I kinda liked the old ST-80 pop up menus with
their selection memory - I'm probably the only one who would admit
that...)
- keyboard focus behavior is probably orthogonal to other feel elements,
but belongs into this category, too.

It might be helpful to view a "theme" as a composition of look and feel
elements. That way, we could have predefined "tinymellow", "fruit" and
"kobold" themes (to avoid trademark infringements :-) ) and user-defined
combinations of looks and feels (for example, a secret GNU admirer in a
microsoft workplace might choose a "kobold" look with the "tinymellow"
feel.)

Cheers,
Hans-Martin
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui