PhiHo wrote:
> When was Smalltalk really invented? > > Was it in 1972 or 1976 or 1980? > > Did Squeak Central insist on creating things that are worse than > Smalltalk-72 and the crowd assumed that it is automatically better > than something "old" like Smalltalk-72? > > For that matter, did the commercial Smalltalk vendors insist > likewise? A couple of 'scholarly' notes here. First, there is a good "later" history of Smalltalk, which decently complements Alan's EHoST, by Adele Goldberg. Here's a citation: Goldberg, A. (1998). The Community of Smalltalk. In P. H. Salus (Ed.), Handbook of Programming Languages, Volume 1: Object-Oriented Programming Languages (pp. 51-94). New York: MacMillan. To my knowledge, this isn't online anywhere, but Peter Salus' Handbook series are big comprehensive tomes that should be available at any decent library. Second, just to respond to the recent historical interest on this list, I am currently completing my PhD dissertation (in education) on the history of the Dynabook/ Smalltalk/Squeak project, which *should* (God and everyone else willing) be complete - and online - this summer or early fall; it is currently caught up in the academic machinery of committees and defences, etc. Hopefully that isn't a too much of a tease... stay tuned. - John Maxwell Canadian Centre for Studies in Publishing Simon Fraser University [hidden email] |
Hi John-- > I am currently completing my PhD dissertation (in education) on the > history of the Dynabook/Smalltalk/Squeak project, which *should* (God > and everyone else willing) be complete - and online - this summer or > early fall... Alright! I'm looking forward to it. -C -- Craig Latta improvisational musical informaticist www.netjam.org Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] |
In reply to this post by John Maxwell
Hi John,
> > > When was Smalltalk really invented? > > > > Was it in 1972 or 1976 or 1980? > > > > Did Squeak Central insist on creating things that are worse than > > Smalltalk-72 and the crowd assumed that it is automatically better > > than something "old" like Smalltalk-72? > > > > For that matter, did the commercial Smalltalk vendors insist > > likewise? > > A couple of 'scholarly' notes here. > > First, there is a good "later" history of Smalltalk, which decently > complements Alan's EHoST, by Adele Goldberg. Here's a citation: > > Goldberg, A. (1998). The Community of Smalltalk. In P. H. Salus > (Ed.), Handbook of > Programming Languages, Volume 1: Object-Oriented > Programming Languages > (pp. 51-94). New York: MacMillan. > > To my knowledge, this isn't online anywhere, but Peter Salus' > Handbook series are big comprehensive tomes that should be available > at any decent library. > Thanks for the tips. I will try to locate these pages. > Second, just to respond to the recent historical interest on this > list, I am currently completing my > PhD dissertation (in education) on the history of the Dynabook/ > Smalltalk/Squeak project, which *should* (God and everyone else > willing) be complete - and online - this summer or early fall; it is > currently caught up in the academic machinery of committees and > defences, etc. Hopefully that isn't a too much of a tease... stay tuned. > > Best wishes, PhiHo |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |