On Sat August 25 2007, Douglas Rollwitz wrote:
> Hi; > > I also would like a more standard UI development tool, > one that we can use for "normal" UI development. For > a few years I extended a tool called BobsUI, trying to > get it to that capability. The more I added to it, > the more I noticed some fundamental problems with the > code however, and decided it needed a big refactoring. > I dropped supporting it due to a lack of time, but I > would like to pick it back up, and have others > participate as well. It needs a lot of work, but I > also believe it can be a very good tool. > > While my goal for BobsUI is for it to be a standard > business UI builder, it looks nothing like a standard > UI builder. This is because I was trying to improve > on the standard UI builders, and have it fit into the > Squeak paradigm. > > I will be creating a BobsUI page on the swiki soon, > which will go over the design and future direction I > would like it to have. You can download BobsUI from > the Squeak Map. > > Because of the work in BobsUI, I have come to the > conclusion that the Moroh-HaloMorph-Halo relationship > needs to be refactored. I actually did this once a > few years ago, but lost the code in a hard disk crash. > Currently I am working on recreating this code > enhancement. I will write another email on that work. Note that there is a group that is cleaning up Morphic. You might contact Juan Vuletich and join efforts. Also: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3005 I don't know how current the group is. I'll CC them to this message. brad _______________________________________________ Morphic mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic |
Hi Folks,
I was part of the "Morphic Team" that was in charge of the Morphic packages in Squeak. I believe it was in the 3.7 or 3.8 days. My work there was splitting the big Morphic package into Morphic, Morphic Extras and Etoys. I also harvested some fixes from Jerome Peace. My idea was to stop adding code and start removing code from Morphic. I found little support for that from the Board and the community. And the next level of cleanup of dependencies between these packages was beyond my possibilities (and I believe beyond anyone's). So I quit and focused on Morphic 3. This project is not (yet) focused on the kind of problems you're talking about, but I'm interested in watching. (BTW, I was not part of MCP). Cheers, Juan Vuletich www.jvuletich.org Brad Fuller wrote: > On Sat August 25 2007, Douglas Rollwitz wrote: > >> Hi; >> >> I also would like a more standard UI development tool, >> one that we can use for "normal" UI development. For >> a few years I extended a tool called BobsUI, trying to >> get it to that capability. The more I added to it, >> the more I noticed some fundamental problems with the >> code however, and decided it needed a big refactoring. >> I dropped supporting it due to a lack of time, but I >> would like to pick it back up, and have others >> participate as well. It needs a lot of work, but I >> also believe it can be a very good tool. >> >> While my goal for BobsUI is for it to be a standard >> business UI builder, it looks nothing like a standard >> UI builder. This is because I was trying to improve >> on the standard UI builders, and have it fit into the >> Squeak paradigm. >> >> I will be creating a BobsUI page on the swiki soon, >> which will go over the design and future direction I >> would like it to have. You can download BobsUI from >> the Squeak Map. >> >> Because of the work in BobsUI, I have come to the >> conclusion that the Moroh-HaloMorph-Halo relationship >> needs to be refactored. I actually did this once a >> few years ago, but lost the code in a hard disk crash. >> Currently I am working on recreating this code >> enhancement. I will write another email on that work. >> > > Note that there is a group that is cleaning up Morphic. You might contact Juan > Vuletich and join efforts. > Also: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3005 > > I don't know how current the group is. I'll CC them to this message. > > brad > _______________________________________________ > Morphic mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic > > > _______________________________________________ Morphic mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic |
Juan,
Thanks for bringing us up to date. That brings up a question. Now that there is a SqueakLand image with the new Etoys, what is the direction for including the newest (OLPC-based) Etoys in Squeak? Anyone know? brad On Sat August 25 2007, Juan Vuletich wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was part of the "Morphic Team" that was in charge of the Morphic > packages in Squeak. I believe it was in the 3.7 or 3.8 days. My work > there was splitting the big Morphic package into Morphic, Morphic Extras > and Etoys. I also harvested some fixes from Jerome Peace. > > My idea was to stop adding code and start removing code from Morphic. I > found little support for that from the Board and the community. And the > next level of cleanup of dependencies between these packages was beyond > my possibilities (and I believe beyond anyone's). So I quit and focused > on Morphic 3. This project is not (yet) focused on the kind of problems > you're talking about, but I'm interested in watching. > > (BTW, I was not part of MCP). > > Cheers, > Juan Vuletich > www.jvuletich.org > > Brad Fuller wrote: > > On Sat August 25 2007, Douglas Rollwitz wrote: > >> Hi; > >> > >> I also would like a more standard UI development tool, > >> one that we can use for "normal" UI development. For > >> a few years I extended a tool called BobsUI, trying to > >> get it to that capability. The more I added to it, > >> the more I noticed some fundamental problems with the > >> code however, and decided it needed a big refactoring. > >> I dropped supporting it due to a lack of time, but I > >> would like to pick it back up, and have others > >> participate as well. It needs a lot of work, but I > >> also believe it can be a very good tool. > >> > >> While my goal for BobsUI is for it to be a standard > >> business UI builder, it looks nothing like a standard > >> UI builder. This is because I was trying to improve > >> on the standard UI builders, and have it fit into the > >> Squeak paradigm. > >> > >> I will be creating a BobsUI page on the swiki soon, > >> which will go over the design and future direction I > >> would like it to have. You can download BobsUI from > >> the Squeak Map. > >> > >> Because of the work in BobsUI, I have come to the > >> conclusion that the Moroh-HaloMorph-Halo relationship > >> needs to be refactored. I actually did this once a > >> few years ago, but lost the code in a hard disk crash. > >> Currently I am working on recreating this code > >> enhancement. I will write another email on that work. > > > > Note that there is a group that is cleaning up Morphic. You might contact > > Juan Vuletich and join efforts. > > Also: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3005 > > > > I don't know how current the group is. I'll CC them to this message. > > > > brad > > _______________________________________________ > > Morphic mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic _______________________________________________ Morphic mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic |
In reply to this post by Juan Vuletich-4
Hi Bert,
Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On Aug 25, 2007, at 19:27 , Juan Vuletich wrote: > >> I found little support for that from the Board > > You make that sound like the Board opposed any of this. This is not > the case, the Board so far has stayed out of *any* technical advise, > it is leaving these to the teams. That's true. > If anything, there was (unfortunately) little support from the Morphic > Team. That's not so true. I was the team leader, so support from the Morphic Team basically meant support for myself. But what I wanted to do would have broken badly back compatibility, and would have caused serious trouble to Etoys users. It was a risky decision, with good and bad consequences for many people. Too much for the Morphic Team (i.e. for myself) to make. That's why I asked the community and the Board for support. Basically, the Board didn't take a position, and the community (almost all who said something) were against it. I understand this, and it's ok. It is just that after that, I started doing all this in my own fork, the Morphic 3.0 image. Cheers, Juan Vuletich www.jvuletich.org > > - Bert - > _______________________________________________ Morphic mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |