2014-05-10 20:27 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>:
The biggest source of differences is usage of FileSystem. FileSystem was originally written by Colin Putney in Squeak, so it should work well in Squeak. IMO, the best thing would be to integrate FileSystem in Squeak. However the Pharo team has significantly modified the API. So now there is a dilemna: which FileSystem should we include in Squeak? I'm for integrating the version of Pharo, in order to reduce the gratuitous differences. Unless there are reasons for not doing so. We should ask Colin, not sure if he follow this list, so I cross post on Squeak-dev.
|
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: --
+1. I *loathe* using the old FileStream/FileDirectory crud but they're what's there.
We should try and merge no? Presumably the Pharo changes come form their actually using FileSystem in anger. It would be great to get it into Squeak for 4.6/5.
Makes sense. And there's a test suite.
best, Eliot
|
On 10.05.2014, at 21:05, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: > We should try and merge no? Presumably the Pharo changes come form their actually using FileSystem in anger. It would be great to get it into Squeak for 4.6/5. > +n Really, would make some seaside loadings a lot easier. best -tobias signature.asc (1K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |