yes, this is likely. I can't reproduce it in the context of MC but =20
IIRC it was exactly this.
When the error occurred I went back in the version of the compiler =20
package and then it worked which led me to the wrong assumption that =20
it was related to the last change. Maybe I had a typo or something...
Adrian
On Jan 13, 2006, at 18:37 , Marcus Denker wrote: