Re: method annotations for 3.9

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: method annotations for 3.9

stéphane ducasse-2
marcus
if we have to recompile the complete image then
        - do you think that we will have some MC problems?
        - do you think that if would make sense to treat the _ as well (I do).
I will give a try to get some experience.

Stef

       
On 15 janv. 06, at 16:31, Marcus Denker wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I checked the annotation changes for conflicts with the latest 3.9.  
> Seems to be no problems.
> The changesets need to be filed in, one recompiles the image, one  
> is hand-reorderd...
>
>
>
> <Annotation-cs.zip>
>
>
> I will do a pass through all the entries on mantis some time next  
> week.. there are
> some important fixes, I think (e.g. one that makes opening any  
> window 40msecs faster,
> lots of small bugfixes, and so on).
>
> And there are a lot of overlaps for the compiler overrides... this  
> will be checked and
> updated soon, too.
>
>      Marcus

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: method annotations for 3.9

Marcus Denker

On 15.01.2006, at 17:14, stéphane ducasse wrote:

> marcus
> if we have to recompile the complete image then
> - do you think that we will have some MC problems?

Very likely. I did not yet try it. Problem is that the changesets  
changes
the compiler. That makes everything quite nasty...

I should work though to load them first via the update stream, then
make new packages and load those with MC.


> - do you think that if would make sense to treat the _ as well (I  
> do).

If that's in the pipeline, yes. Would safe one recompile.

> I will give a try to get some experience.

Ok.

     Marcus