Re: relational for what?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: relational for what?

Stephan Eggermont-3
>>What, really?  There are many possible reasons that Google don't use  an
>>RDBMS to index the web: stupidity, arrogance, excessive cost of an  RDBMS,
>>sound engineering decisions, or a combination of these.

>I'm not saying Google are idiots.  Clearly not.  I was basically just
>questioning using them as some sort of counter point against RDBM systems.  
>I think you could do the same thing they did with a RDBMS, but not on a
>bunch of low end computers.  You would have to spend some cash.

If you take a look at the access patterns of google you should
be able to see that if you wanted to eliminate a lot of cpu's,
you'd need an exchange rate of 1 cpu for 100 disks or so.
That's not cost-effective at all.

Stephan Eggermont